this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
956 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35193 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

This is only barely relevant, but it’s always funny to me that we had to develop completely separate processing systems to account for the fact that genitals look weird. Their appearances are so strange that you’d rather avoid them, if not for the portion of your brain that deadens your disgust. The meat hole and the yam-mushroom. Not nature’s finest works.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is kind of wild. Some dudes have small dicks, big dicks, egg-shaped dicks.. Stinky dicks with moles on them.. Fat dicks with freckles.. Dicks that look like sad elephants.. Dicks that look like Shar Peis..

Then you have big vaginas, small vaginas, long vaginas, sleeve of wizard vaginas, jutting serrated-looking labia vaginas, wise old horse-like vaginas, cauliflower vaginas, meat pile vaginas, vaginas that look like Shar Peis..

And any of these.. And I mean any of them... can be on the hottest person you've seen in your life. It's like opening a Kinder Egg. Drop in a coin, pull the lever, and see what surprises await you in the dankest, steamiest, most razor-burnt region inside of your new partner's pants.

[–] indomara@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This is hilarious, you have a gift with words!

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

develop completely separate processing systems to account for the fact that genitals look weird. Their appearances are so strange that you’d rather avoid them

wat

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Alright, so you’re looking at a hot man or woman. You recognize that their characteristics are attractive. Maybe you like big titties, maybe you like developed delts, maybe you like a nice set of hands. Most anyone who sees these will say something to the effect of “oh yeah, those are fine body parts. I have no issue viewing them.”

Genitalia, on the other hand, are not one of the most attractive parts on a person. Just look at the sort of pelvic accessory you’re not interested in (bi people, I’m sorry) and you’ll pretty quickly realize that they’re just no fun to look at. When you get closer and you’re hit with acidic or ammonia-esque scents, it only gets worse.

In order to get around the minor issue of procreation avoidance, a portion of your brain chimes in and says “well actually, it’s not so bad. Give it a chance.” Consider the difference between your perceptions before and after puberty, if you’d care to understand on a human level. (Ace people, I’m sorry) Or check out more articles if you’d like to study this a bit further.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Interestingly, it's not about the look of genitalia specifically.

For example, I happen to be a hetero person, yet I appreciate both genitals equally. What matters is how feminine the carrier is. I'll appreciate a nice dick on a beautiful woman, but on a man...ew. Same with vaginas - if it belongs to a woman, it can be very arousing, but you won't find trans men in my bedroom.

It's the same genitals, but their perception is wildly different.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don’t in fact, happen to be hetero

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you like dick, and you like pussy, you’re not straight. Pick one: bi/pan/queer/other

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like women, hence, I'm hetero. Shouldn't be too hard.

Now, you can make categories of dick lovers and vagina appreciators, but "hetero", just as "homo" and the rest, refers to gender attraction, not genitals. No need to gatekeep that.

I have no objection being called queer, but definitionally I'm just not.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No it actually refers to sex, not gender. Gay for a man is loving dick, not loving males.

Definitionally you aren’t hetero if you enjoy both sexual organs.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It’s amazing that I’ve triggered you so much you’ve made assumptions on age. It’s unfortunate your brain rot can’t accept the dictionary’s definition:

Heterosexual: sexually or romantically attracted to people of the other sex.

I’m truly sorry they didn’t consult your feelings when writing the definition little snowflake

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

lol i love how the abstract cites a paper from 1942

look: if you're disgusted by genitals, i'm sorry to hear that, and i'm not judging you.

but don't sit there and try to tell me everyone, or even "most people" feels that way.

i can't speak for goofy looking dicks, but vulvas are extremely attractive; i dunno wtf you, or your 1942 paper referencing "study" are talking about.

again--i'm not judging. but i suggest you post to asklemmy (or literally any other forum), and ask: "are female genitalia no fun to look at/unattractive/weird/whatever tf else" and consider that maybe whatever problem you have with vaginas might not be a baked in instinctual thing that everyone has

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 14 points 2 days ago

puritans

explains a ton

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some vulvas are pretty. Most aren't. Some do smell weird, I imagine most will in the right wrong set of conditions. I like going down on them, but it isn't because of their beauty.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

YOU WANT TO DROWN IN SHEMEN DINT YOU?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The paper from 1942 was meant to establish long standing scientific curiosity about the topic, you.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you goober.

you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience. the fact that you're trying to, and then calling me "goober" is quite enough for me to say: best of luck, tiger

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I agree with you, but you have to put forward a point that doesn’t stand atop misunderstanding a citation, or else I’ll name you another foodstuff

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wait, goober is a foodstuff?

???

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another name for a peanut. Not sure how it became a soft pejorative, but I’m a fan

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What?

I've literally never heard of goober as meaning peanut.

I thought it basically just meant 'glob' when describing a physical thing, and when describing a person, basically the same as 'derpy', like uh, silly, absent minded, something like that, and is mostly meant in an at least semi endearing way.

[–] croizat@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's why the Goofy Goober from SpongeBob is a peanut (there's also a peanut candy called goobers)

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s a borrowed African word. Borrowed in the 1800s. Borrowed by Americans. Borrowed. But it eventually shifted at some point in the last century to the definition most people are familiar with, though I can’t figure out how or why.

perhaps you are looking for the word loanword can i lend it to you?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Huh, well TIL, thanks!

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago

Objective truth, ungoober’d

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I appreciate the extremely inclusive way to explain how everyone, deep down, is disgusted by all forms of genitals.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

One could say they're an acquired taste.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This would also explain why basically a shortcut in horror monster/alien/scenery/set design is to start with genitalia as a style guide, and then distort it and/or apply it to objects that do not normally come even close to that.

Monster zombie dog?

Make dog naked, furless, and veiny, throbbing, skin where you can see it isn't bleeding, but theres tons of blood right at the surface of the skin, also its mouth/head is now basically a vaginal opening with teeth, but uh, opening horizontally instead of vertically.

See how easy this is?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The design of the Xenomorph from Alien is famously like that. It has feminine curves, but a phallic head. And facehugger is basically raping the victims to impregnate them. All of these design choices were intentional to evoke the disgust/fear of the audience, I remember reading about this

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Half Life (2) monsters as well.

The, uh, the gonarchs, the 'adult headcrabs' on Xen?

Yeah, it literally just is giant walking ballsack, pretty sure the concept artist basically just says that directly in 'Raising the Bar'.

A bunch of the planned enemy types that existed in the beta/alpha, before Valve/HL2 got hacked and they significantly shifted development... a lot of the enemy types had concepts of much more fleshy/flappy/foldy appearances, often with hair, again, like pubic hair.

But they toned that down a lot, made them much sleeker, more 'synth' than ... i guess monstrosity.

But but, then of course, Eli gets skull fucked to death by a giant penis tentacle, extending out from... basically a giant floating testicle sans scrotum, in Ep 2.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

bi people, I'm sorry

Oh no, whatever shall I do!
cackles in horny

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

That's why my favorite euphemism for sex is "bumping uglies". Its just a perfect description of it.

bi people, I’m sorry

hey i prefer my mate not have an ovipositor but you do you

Genitals are cool, I have pictures of all types glued to my truck so I can share them with the world.

They smell and taste as good as they look too!

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's plenty of instances and subreddits devoted to pictures of just genitals

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

Just between you and me, I’ve been known to peruse them as well.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

When aroused your brain basically forgets how to be disgusted to some degree, and to varying extent per person. The brain falls into a more passive state allowing the hindbrain to focus on instinct for reproduction.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago

I think I get what you're trying to say, that non-genital features are more aesthetically pleasing. That genitals aren't that often featured in art. We usually don't go "wow those are some pretty genitals, damn".

But, it's also just your brain that tells you that the other parts are pretty. I bet all of them would look weird to an alien. It's just your brain telling you what to like

[–] lemonwood@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We are naturally appalled by feces. Since the butthóle contains em, that goes for it too. So no, it not just him.

In fact, it is likely just you, havin a kink.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hol up I think I completely misunderstood the thread here.

[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Really? Do you have more info on that, it's the first time I'm hearing about it and I'm genuinely intrigued

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

There are plenty of articles about the phenomenon, but this one covers the interpersonal portions pretty well

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4687750/

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

Teeth too. Try going to the hospital for a dental emergency.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Larry Flynt has entered the chat...