317

American XL bully dogs to be banned after attacks, Rishi Sunak says (news.sky.com)

submitted 1 year ago by alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

236 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a pitbull owner, I may take my chances trying to subdue an aggressive PB. An agressive Rot, I’m climbing trees.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Growing up a neighbor had three Rottweilers that they let run free.

They mostly stayed on their property, but every once and a while they'd come down to my house. Usually because they were following a deer's trail, so their prey drive was in full gear by the time they'd see me and my sister playing outside.

Rotts get up to like 120lbs on average, but some are even bigger. So out of nowhere we'd have these three massive dogs that were bigger than us, sprinting at us barking their heads off.

We weren't good tree climbers, so we got one of those wooden playhouse things you had to climb a ladder to get in.

I still don't think we should ban them, but I think most people agree dogs shouldn't be free roam.

[-] kale@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Barking is a performative aggression. It's meant to intimidate. Predatory attacks frequently don't have warning barks. It's quiet staring then a lunge.

The behavior you described sounds dangerous, but it's a known thing (that doesn't make it less dangerous, but does give opportunity to blame the owner that they should have known they had an aggressive dog). Terrible owners don't correct this behavior and have dogs that are dangerous to people. But there are many dogs that show zero aggression before attacking. There's a bunch of biased sources but I think there is some truth to it, nearly half of dogs that kill have not shown aggression towards humans before.

Side note: Rottweilers are the #2 killer dog breed in America. They average about 10% of all fatal attacks. Pits are the #1 killer dog breed. The past couple of years they've been 65%+ of fatal attacks.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My dream is everyone eventually learns what "per capital" means and how important it is compared to total numbers...

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I have a rottie. If someone told me she bit them, I'd want to know what the hell they did to make her bite them. She's never shown any aggression.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Rottweilers are chill as fuck with a very high anger threshold but also have a very strong protective streak and the build to back it up. That can go haywire if the owner is an idiot, paranoid, or such. If she recognises you as pack leader and you're not then there's not really much to worry, though some German states require character tests for all Rottweilers or they have to wear muzzles. If something like that is available where you are I'd definitely recommend it, they're a working breed consider it vocational training.

And they can growl like fucking Cerberus. Why bite when a little intimidation does the trick.

[-] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win 1 points 1 year ago

Not knocking Rots, as a breed. Beautiful animals with a lot of love to give.

[-] coco@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

My old doggo mastiff/ unknow race mix doesnt like to be patted upon i earned peiple not doing that b4 getting closer to my doggo

She doesnt bite but give some kind of soft bite to warn

I wont tell the amount of people thinking my doggo is petable whose beeen bitten off including careless childrens at dog park

To each their behavior

Surelly blast me but my doggo is my bodyguard for some reason

[-] Smartboystupid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Idiot

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023

317 points (92.3% liked)

World News

39142 readers

2576 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.