1194
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 1bluepixel@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago

The easy, low-cost solution is to build freight rail. But no, that's communism and it doesn't get a tech billionaire their extra billion.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Somehow capitalists all over the world love freight trains. It's just US being dumb as always.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

US freight rail is fine and a lot of cargo goes by train for the most part. There's still gotta be trucks to get to and from the terminal. Not many facilities have built in rail spurs, or the need to ship an entire train load at once for that matter

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So what's the point of the OPs comment?

[-] imBANO@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Rails are indeed one of the cheapest, best scaling, and most reliable ways to move goods no doubt, but it also has a last mile problem.

Just wanted to point out the solution isn’t as easy as “rails all things”. Trucks still do offer some situational advantages, and will still have their place in logistics.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I agree with the sentiment, but did you not notice the "across the country" part of the title?

[-] imBANO@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Fair response. It’s likely due to the lack of rail infrastructure why this delivery was “across the country”. Rails are typically much cheaper per ton-mile than trucks. If a rail alternative existed, I’m fairly certain the economics would have forced the use of trains.

However, I’d say the self driving part is still be a benefit that would improve truck utilization rate.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I did some digging. According to the article, the route went from Tulare, CA to Quakertown, PA. OpenRailwayMap is really good for this. Both have freight rail lines running directly through the heart of the town. Going by destination alone, this is kind of a pointless operation. Then again, the point was more to demonstrate the possibility of an autonomous truck rather than whether that particular route made any sense.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The place of trucks in logistics is in hell, delivering coal.

If it can be done economically, it'll be done. And it has been, the freight rail network in the US is huge.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today -1 points 1 year ago

There is nothing low cost or easy about building coast to coast freight rail. It would take a minimum of 20 years and cost billions.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

The US has had a transcontinental railroad network for over a century. The Western US was initially settled largely on railway stops, land grants, and mandatory passenger service. The passenger service was one of the conditions for the land grants.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US has had a transcontinental railroad network for over a century.

Sure, now try and figure out the expense and time required to build another one NOW, not in 1890 but in 2023. The right of ways alone may take you until 2123 to get sorted out and I really suspect that the Chinese aren't going to show up to work for pennies a day to build the thing.

The passenger service was one of the conditions for the land grants.

We aren't talking about Passenger Service. We're talking about Cargo Service and since we already have one TC Rail System it follows that the meme is agitating that we build another one.

It would take decades and cost billions, probably tens of billions.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
1194 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1247 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS