148
submitted 11 months ago by Camzing@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

It serms incredible to me to give over a billion dollars to a random person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 149 points 11 months ago

Not really.

The lottery is paid for by those who all have an equal chance of winning that prize. Also, the profits from lotteries are usually spent on social funds etc.

I feel more conflicted about thr fact that it preys on addiction and those who buy the most lottery tickets are often those who can least afford them. I find that much more grotesque than a random person getting very lucky, but to each their own.

[-] Camzing@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Half would go to the government no?

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

In the US, close to half of the winnings do go to the lottery, plus a portion of each lottery ticket usually goes to fund some government agency. Schools, programs for the impoverished and disenfranchised, etc.

The real question, in my opinion, is if you are willing to spend that much money on a ticket, why aren't you willing to spend that much money on just outright funding government programs? Imagine if 100% of what someone paid for a ticket went to programs for the disenfranchised? That could make real difference.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Probably worth noting that, at least in places like Texas, they take the funds from the lottery, allocate it to school, and then take the same amount of money out of schools to fund whatever bullshit they want.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

And then in some places they decide to divert the school money for a new Raiders stadium.

[-] rebul@kbin.social -3 points 11 months ago

I spend about $10 per year on lottery tickets. I pay upwards of $40k in taxes, much of which is funneled to "disenfranchised". I'm good, thanks.

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Ok, but if you had a guarantee that your $10 would go directly to the disenfranchised with no chances of returning millions to you, how would that change things?

[-] rebul@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Handing money out to the "disenfranchised" solves nothing, thus it never ends. I am for real solutions, like education and a strong family unit. But, you know, having that opinion means I am racist/classist/whatever "ist".

[-] Thaumiel@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Love the quote marks around disenfranchised. Real classy.

Let's see... cursory glance at post history indicates... Yep, right wing, anti union and against a living wage. That all tracks.

[-] rebul@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Quote marks because "disenfranchised" is subjective. And wow, you have mad skills to look at someone's post history. Aren't you quite the haxxor?

I consider myself moderate. Lefty tools such as yourself label anyone that disagrees with them as right wing racist maga nazis. Fuck you.

I am anti union. Unions served a great purpose 100 years ago. Now they are corrupt shake down organizations that contribute to inflation and drive jobs out of the country. But if someone wants to join one, I don't care, it's none of my business. Just don't use my tax dollars to fund any of it.

Living wage. There is this idiotic entitlement mentality that people somehow deserve a "living wage" simply for consuming oxygen. Here is the truth: people are paid what they are worth. If you are providing real value to an employer, they will pay you enough to retain you. If they don't, find another employer. Rinse and repeat.

But nah, it's easier to blame shortcomings on billionaires/Trump/"the man"/"disenfranchisement" and hope some politician will send you money for your vote.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

It seems to simply be a difference in values. I personally think a human being has value simply for existing, and many others would agree on this. Nothing idiotic about valuing different things.

[-] rebul@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

We are in agreement, humans do have value. My point is that a living wage is possible, but it requires effort and sometimes tough decisions. Everyone should have the opportunity to better their lives, but I disagree that everyone is entitled to a 'living wage' simply for being alive. Have you not been to a restaurant where the service was terrible? Do those employees deserve a living wage?

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

It seems that where we differ is they yes, I do think that employee providing shitty service deserves a living wage. But more importantly, there's so much that people do for us that should be paid but isn't, or that isn't paid enough to live off of but should be. People who volunteer their time to clean up public spaces, to help take care of the sick and elderly or young children, people producing art for the rest of us to enjoy, people doing doing fundamental research on topics that aren't currently trendy, and likely many more that aren't coming to mind right now.

[-] rebul@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Their choice to provide shitty service is also a choice to not have a "living wage".

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Just cut to the point and say you hate poor people already.

[-] rebul@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

Nah, I hate dumbasses. Like you.

[-] atomWood@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

That depends on the government in question. For example, the Canadian government does not have a claim on any kind of lottery or game show winnings.

[-] Camzing@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
[-] atomWood@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

To my understanding, and a quick Google search, winnings are never taxed.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Correct. And they’ll get your money for you if you win big in Vegas.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Lottery > Casinos for sure

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
148 points (80.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26271 readers
743 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS