752

Gaza hospitals ceasing to function as water and fuel run out (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by pleasemakesense@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

242 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago

Just lovely how everybody is forgetting that Israel is responsible for that.

Everyone can always blame someone else, especially in this conflict. It's time for Israel to grow up and take responsibility for its actions. They have caused harm, anger, and hatred by using terrorism (fear and violence) to enforce their rule over people. Somehow we (the US and most of the west) provide them with resources and weapons though. How fucked up is that?

[+] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago

Then by that logic it's fair game for native Americans to start cleansing all European bloodlines in the United States? As a Latino person, I can go into any southwest state and start killing my neighbors because their ancestors "caused harm, anger, and hatred by using terrorism (fear and violence) to enforce their rule over people"?

How are you tankies this fucking dumb?

[-] a_random_large_banana 9 points 1 year ago

But they're STILL causing them harm and anger and using terrorism, right now, actively, even before the 7th of october, it's been ongoing for over 75 years, it hasn't stopped once, its been happening everyday in Gaza and the West Bank (where Hamas isn't), besides the fact that the occupation power very explicitly stated its intentions of basically deleting every single Palestinian, even before the 7th of october.

other than the starvation and thirst they're forcing onto them, they keep bombing civilian buildings, they bombed multiple medical centers including a hospital where over 1000 people (injured civilians from the occupation's bombings), over half of which were children, toddlers, and babies died.

and to top all of that off, from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml

Article 8, section 2.b: 2.b.i. Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

2.b.ii. Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;

israel is committing war crimes and being praised and supported for it.

nothing justifies the intentional or unintentional killing of any civilians, children, women, or men, EVEN IF THE ENEMY WAS KILLING CIVILIANS TOO!

Let's also not forget that israel is one of the largest and most powerful military entities in the world, supported by even larger military powers, going against this tiny patch of land called Gaza, where the people there have been continually oppressed for over 75 years, Hamas's homemade mortars dont do nearly as much damage as israel's US-made targetted missiles, and it's obvious from the fact that no building has been brought down in israel by Hamas, while Gaza is being basically flattened as we speak.

Do some research before posting online.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, dude. I'm not saying what Hamas is doing is "fair game". I'm saying Israel has a responsibility in it, and they aren't handling it well. In the past, I totally understand native Americans killing settlers, especially on their land that was promised to them in treaties that they agreed to when moving. Present day, this stuff isn't happening. If anything, we're trying to make up for those actions that we now see as a mistake. In present day Israel though, they're actively performing those actions that cause the inhabitants to feel the need to fight back.

Also, not a tanky. Not everyone who disagrees with Zionism is anti-semitic or a tanky. Grow up and try to come up with an actual reasonable argument.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023

752 points (95.6% liked)

World News

39364 readers

2159 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.