393
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social 27 points 10 months ago

Who's gonna build and maintain these camps? Have you seen the state of white people lately? We couldn't even get enough non-immigrant labor for food, let alone concentration camps. Plus NIMBY already hits hard on facilities that house undesirable populations, you think conservatives want to dedicate land near their own homes for immigrants? They're already busing and flying them away.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All they need to build well is the walls, and all they need to maintain is the locks.

The quality is intentional. They intend to let them die as an example.

E: lot of trump supporters upset to have their plans highlighted, I see

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You want a Russian style gulag system? Go fuck yourself. Better yet, move to Russia, then go fuck yourself.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 10 months ago

Want? No, thats what they are advertising.

Were you under the impression trump was building healthy accomodations?

No dumbass, he is trying to kill these people. He is going to lock them in a box and let them starve to death. Thats his platform. He wants another holocaust.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

They'd use National Guard.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
393 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
5089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS