1303
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're kidding right? Pardons in themselves are crazy, but didn't know presidents can pardon themselves?

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 71 points 11 months ago

Turns out most of the US government relied on norms, traditions, and basic human decency, but very little of it was actually codified into law. Which in this day and age is like having no rules at all since no one has any shame anymore

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Thank God for Trump, unironically. Stress-testing helps highlight problems.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago

Just like when the Weimar Republic was stress tested.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

We seem to be reacting similarly too. As if nothing is happening.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Except that nobody is actually stopping tiny hands the wanna be Hitler.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 62 points 11 months ago

Weve never had to worry about it before, there's no precedent

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago

Which is the problem she's trying to address. It's become very obvious that precedent is no longer good enough when you have unethical, immoral, shady people in charge.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

This is going to be the subtitle for whoever writes the book about Trump in a few years.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 27 points 11 months ago

The rules around pardons are incredibly vague. Presidents have typically treated them vary seriously and used them sparingly. Then Trump saw it as an opportunity to make some cash and do favors for his cronies who committed crimes to help him.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 15 points 11 months ago

The legal consensus is that they can't, but it's never been tested --nor did anyone ever seriously conceive of it as a possibility-- so it's theoretically possible as a matter of law.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Only works on Federal crimes the state and local ones that he committed will still stick. So that Georgia election will not be going away

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

That's not really been tested.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 6 points 11 months ago

You seriously haven't heard any discussion about a president potentially pardoning himself? Where have you been the last 6 years

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

As a non-american, living in an other continent, this is indeed news to me. It's honestly the first time I hear about this being annactual possibility. I'm fact, its a couple of days ago that I found out, (through Lemmy) that there is no limit to how many pardons a president can issue! I thought it was only a few!

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Word around town is Trump was selling pardons for $2M each. If you look at some of the pardons he granted on his way out, it seems quite possible.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1303 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS