439
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 146 points 11 months ago

And yet people keep telling me that Biden needs to lose so that Democrats can be "taught a lesson."

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Ah yes! Enlightened Centrist and Libertarians. They will always vote GOP no matter how horrible the candidate is with some shit reason to not vote Democrat. OR they will vote for some numbnuts third party candidate with an equally shitty reason.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 31 points 11 months ago

The common talking points these days are either, "DeMoCrAtS aRe FaScIsTs, ToO!" or, "DeMoCrAtS nEeD tO eArN mY vOtE!"

And I'm sure the next generation will thank them for taking an ideological stand right as Fascism is trying to take over. /s

[-] Setarkus@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Democrats are fascists, too

Special emphasis on "too", of course

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 19 points 11 months ago

Don't vote Democrat, vote third party I hear! Me, I'm like well with first past the post voting this is impractical and could help empower fascists to take over, but let's see what options we got.

/opens box of third party candidates, before gently closing it and walking away

Yeah no, Biden still best option, these guys are nutters. It makes sense though, a sensible candidate would run in the democratic primaries, rather than hurting their own purported causes by running in the general in a first past the post election. It's why you saw Bernie Sanders, an independent, running in the democratic primary, and not out there helping to siphon votes to fascists by running as a third party in the general against Biden.

Anyways, let's focus on continuing to empower politicians that want to improve our voting system (usually has been democrats, though with an exception in Alaska). This starts at the local level, but we're getting more and more federal offices now with ranked choice voting. Once you have that, then better quality third party candidates will follow, knowing they can fairly safely run without harming their own causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I do worry that Biden will lose though. He was far from a popular candidate to begin with and his support of Israel's genocide of Palestinians has made him even less so. In many ways the best outcome might be for him to die in office prior to the election or for him to lose the primary. It would hurt the Democrats to have a non-incumbent running, but possibly less than running Biden. The real wildcard though is if Trump will even end up on the ballot considering his legal issues.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 40 points 11 months ago

I do worry that Biden will lose though.

Good. Everybody should think this. Thinking Trump can't possibly win is how he won in 2016.

We need to behave as if it's a real possibility, even if you feel optimistic about next year.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We need to behave as if it’s a real possibility, even if you feel optimistic about next year.

Party leadership should also be doing this and doing what they can to win voters. Instead, the only message I'm hearing is "if you breathe so much as a word of discontent, it's because you're a Russian troll who wants Trump to be dictator for life."

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

It would hurt the Democrats to have a non-incumbent

If Biden were not on the ballot next year, the Democratic candidate would be Kamala Harris. No mainstream Democrat would challenge her in 2024, the optics would be horrible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

The way that talking point gets pushed unusually hard by an unusually dedicated few using the same stupid arguments looks an awful lot like the kind of psyops campaigns I'd see when I was on Reddit during the Trump presidency.

The real long term solution is changing how we vote. Star Voting or some form of Ranked Choice. That's how I respond along with https://fairvote.org so, in case some impressionable soul happens along, they aren't taken in by such silliness. I encourage others to consider doing something similar.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We already learned that lesson - in 2016.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

People have no idea how to move the overton window.

load more comments (38 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
439 points (84.0% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3383 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS