374
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

James Somerton was making $170,000 a year with nearly 6 million views and 267,000 subscribers on YouTube, until...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dellish@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago

Is him being gay even relevant to what happened, or are they just trying to make this about something it's not?

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 130 points 11 months ago

It's very relevant. One of the big points in the hbomberguy video is that James was known as a prominent voice in the LGBT community, and he blatantly plagiarized other LGBT creators that might have otherwise gained a larger following themselves

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 89 points 11 months ago

It's core to Hbomberguy's video, really. The guy tried to make himself the gay YouTuber by ripping off other queer content producers, and as a persecuted community that's had to deal with a forever of social erasure, that's a whole lot extra shitty.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's a little relevant. He's a gay focused YouTuber, in that he talked about gay topics in media, supposedly championing gay voices, while at the same time silencing those same gay voices, stealing their content and claiming it as his own.

For wanting to help the gay community, he really did a lot to hurt the community and help himself. All he had to do is give credit to the people he quoted, but when confronted with accusations, he would claim he's being silenced as a gay creator rather than admit the truth, and his followers would attack the accusers on his behalf, thinking he's being genuine.

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 25 points 11 months ago

He wasn't quoting people though, he was straight up reading other people's work and claiming it as his own. Like whole paragraphs at a time just copy/pasted with a couple words swapped out. Even with proper citations you would be kicked out of college for plagiarizing if you submitted something like that.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

What he did was beyond quoting.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 54 points 11 months ago

His channel was about LGBT issues, so it's actually relevant. It's a reasonable concern and the source material is a four hour long breadtube thing bordering on self-parody, so I don't mind responding to this one.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 28 points 11 months ago

Maybe try reading the article.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s posted on lgbtqnation. I’m pretty sure that for their audience it’s incredibly fucking relevant.

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago
[-] 3laws@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

It's more than relevant. It's pivotal to the whole ordeal.

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago

Ita an article from a website called lgbtqnation so its not that surprising. Also the guy stole a lot from queer people and was a misogynist.

[-] kzhe@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

Yes, very relevant.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I guess him being gay isn't exactly important. The important thing is that the content that he stole was mostly about LGBTQ media studies. So "gayness" is relevant, but strictly speaking his gayness is not.

Edit: I would also note that if the headline writer was just adding "gay" to be incendiary, the writer could have said "Gay youtuber taken down by bi youtuber" but that would needlessly putting in the "bi" label. The "gay youtuber" is "writing" about gay stuff.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I highly doubt someone writing for LGBTQ Nation is adding “gay” to the headline to be incendiary.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
374 points (94.3% liked)

News

23259 readers
2891 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS