86
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
86 points (93.0% liked)
Atheism
3984 readers
111 users here now
Community Guide
Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.
Statement of Purpose
- This is a support and conversation community for people who don't believe in gods.
- Superstition hucksters have no reason to subscribe or post here at all.
- If you are looking to debate or proselytize, options will be linked lower in the sidebar.
Acceptable
- Honest questions or conversations.
- Discussions on parenting or advice.
- Struggles, frustrations, coming out.
- Atheist memes. We can have fun!
- News headlines relevant to atheism.
Unacceptable
Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.
- Anything against site rules.
- Illegal and/or NSFW material.
- Troll posts and comments. There will be no attempt to explain what that means.
- Leading questions, agenda pushing, or disingenuous attempts to bait members.
- Personal attacks or flaming.
Inadvisable
- Self promotion or upvote farming.
- Excessive shitposting or off-topic discussion.
Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.
Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.
~ /c/nostupidquestions
If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!
Connect with Atheists
- Matrix: #atheism:envs.net
Help and Support Links
- Freedom From Religion Foundation
- The Secular Therapy Project
- Secular Students Alliance
- Black Nonbelievers
- The Clergy Project
- Atheist Alliance International
- Sunday Assembly
- Atheist Ireland
- Atheism UK
- Atheists United
Streaming Media
This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.
- Atheist Debates - Matt Dillahunty
- Rationality Rules
- Friendly Atheist
- Making Sense with Sam Harris
- Cosmic Skeptic
- Genetically Modified Skeptic
- Street Epistemology
- Armored Skeptic
- NonStampCollector
Orgs, Blogs, Zines
- Center for Inquiry
- American Atheists
- Humanists International
- Atheist Republic
- The Brights
- The Angry Atheist
- History for Atheists
- Rationalist International
- Atheist Revolution
- Debunking Christianity
- Godless Mom
- Atheist Freethinkers
Mainstream
Bibliography
Start here...
...proceed here.
- God is Not Great (Hitchens)
- The God Delusion (Dawkins)
- The End of Faith (Harris)
- Why I Am Not a Christian (Russell)
- Letter to a Christian Nation (Harris)
Proselytize Religion
From Reddit
As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
― Steven Weinberg
@FlyingSquid @YoBuckStopsHere
Or patriotism.
Tribalism is basically the problem.
"Quotemining is a rigorous proof" -W.V.O. Quine probably
When did I say anything about proof?
If this is all just a game about writing a string of characters, then why are you complaining about my comment?
If it's not then why are you endorsing a false statement?
Do you really not understand that people can say things which other people can agree with without being able to prove them? What do you want, a morality survey?
I understand it. It's not a logical action. You're not some misunderstood super genius, you're a standard internet poster who blindly accepts and endorses false statements simply because it agrees with your preconceived notions.
I like how this entire time you're arguing for why you posted it (which nobody actually cares about), and not actually defending the statement made.
What are you even talking about now?
You literally forgot that you posted a quote claiming that religion is necessary for immoral actions?
Are you actually so stupid that external parties understand your motivations better than you?
Insulting me does not clarify your previous post, but it does make me uninclined to talk with you further. I have very little interest in incivility.
There is nothing to clarify, especially since you never even specified what confused you.
"It does make me uninclined to talk to you further"
Oh no, what shall I do?
Everything you say confuses me, starting with you having some issue with me pasting a quote. Why do you even give a shit? If you don't like what I post, just block me.
"Why do you even give a shit"
Why did you post it? My reason for posting a criticism is atleast as valid as yours for posting the initial comment. The primary difference is that my clearly satirical fake quote wasn't deliberately conveying a false statement.
"Just block me"
Please people, don't criticise me!
If you announce something to the public, the public can respond back. The world isn't a pulpit to preach from.
It isn't a fake quote.
https://thefederal.com/obituary/steven-weinberg-a-physicist-who-found-religion-an-insult-to-human-dignity/
I didn't even read the rest because that's just a lie.
Why are you even talking to me if you're going to lie and gaslight?
I characterised my statement as a fake quote, you illiterate dolt, "fake" is literally directly after "my " and before "quote". It was satirizing your quote-mining of a clearly false statement, by attributing another clearly false statement to a noted logician and pretending that it was therefore correct, because that's exactly what you did.
Huh. So maybe I'm not the genius you claimed I think I am and actually the idiot I think I am.
Can you imagine? You not being right about me?
Yes, I can imagine. You are probably somewhat self-aware that you are a moron. That's why you commit an appeal to authority fallacy in your initial comment.
But keep on imaging that you can play epistemic games with me.
Somewhat? I literally said I'm an idiot. Where is the somewhat? How much more direct do I have to be?