438
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by sousmerde_retardatr@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

Previous title apparently :

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Spare me your insults.

A bunch of half starved poorly armed guerrillas are an “existential threat” to Israel?

They are unlikely to win but if they did, yes, the consequences would be existential. It wasn't long ago that Israel was the underdog in this conflict.

[-] Sparlock@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They are unlikely to win

One of the most modern and well funded militaries in the world backed by the world superpower VS guys with ak-47s of vietnam era vintage. You cannot be serious.
If you really think this is true that Israel would be defeated by hamas you are beyond rational discussion and of in some fantasy world of victimhood.

Spare me your insults.

How bout you spare me your inane fictions and we can talk. If you cannot manage that then just piss off.

[-] Sparlock@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Because they don’t have the means to fight back and win. Because if they insist on intifada they will end up with nothing. --DarkGamer

They are unlikely to win but if they did, yes, the consequences would be existential. It wasn’t long ago that Israel was the underdog in this conflict. --DarkGamer

So they are both weak and strong. Hrm right out of the fascists handbook.

Keep telling us who you are when you get back from your goose-stepping practice.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Clearly you have difficulties with the concept of time. They were weak they are strong. But any excuse to call those who disagree fascist, I guess.

[-] Sparlock@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

LOL you are amazing at justifying your bullshit.

I noticed the zionists seem to like saying that gaza isn't being carpet bombed and such so how do you explain :

“Dresden, Hamburg, Cologne — some of the world’s heaviest-ever bombings are remembered by their place names,” said Robert Pape, a US military historian and author of Bombing to Win, a landmark survey of 20th century bombing campaigns. “Gaza will also go down as a place name denoting one of history’s heaviest conventional bombing campaigns.” from the financial times (non paywalled no excuses link https://archive.ph/DSZ1b/ )

They even have pretty graphs showing how it is worse.

Oh and since you seem to think TIME is an issue for me tell me how fast was WW2 vs everything since Oct 7?? Nevermind I'll just tell you since your propaganda addled brain (yea that's an insult you dipshit) will try to block it out. "By contrast, over the space of two years, between 1943 and 1945, the Allied bombing of 61 major German cities razed an estimated 50 per cent of their urban areas, according to Pape."

Odd how these things seem bad even in the light of history, maybe Israel can get all the way to # 1 on the charts!!!

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
438 points (92.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12269 readers
1407 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS