110
Just Plane Wrong: Celebs with the Worst Private Jet Co2 Emissions | Insights | Yard (2022) (weareyard.com)
submitted 10 months ago by iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A full breakdown of the top 10 celebrity CO2e offenders:

  1. Taylor Swift: 8,293.54 tonnes (per year), or 1,184.8 times more than the average person's total annual emissions.

  2. Floyd Mayweather: 7,076.8 tCO2e (tonnes of CO2 emitted, per year)

  3. Jay-Z: 6,981.3 tCO2e

  4. A-Rod ( J-Lo's ex-fiance and baseball player) : 5,342.7 tCO2e

  5. Blake Shelton: 4495 tCO2e

  6. Steven Spielberg: 4,465 tCO2e

  7. Kim Kardashian: 4268.5 tCO2e

  8. Mark Wahlberg: 3772.85 tCO2e

  9. Oprah Winfrey: 3,493.17 tCO2e

  10. Travis Scott (Kylie Jenner’s Beau) : 3033.3 tCO2e

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When are we going to introduce tokens to handle externalities like this? It shouldn't be possible or at least easy to abuse resources like this.

[-] iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

i see, time for ~~food~~ calorie stamps i guess ..

[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not what i'm suggesting, and the limits and costs associated with externalities could be tuned so that the life of a normal person would not be altered if not in the sense that you would get additional tokens that you can keep or sell depending on your needs and personal values. I can elaborate if it's unclear.

The real change would be that if a billionaire wants to live that kind of lifestyle, they would have to gather enough tokens from the market. This would really enable some sort of trickle down because they would have to buy the tokens from you and you would always be able to tell them "no" and keep them from polluting.

[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To clarify, these tokens would be in addition to money, not a replacement for them. It's a concept more similar to the carbon markets but they would be at the level of the citizen.

[-] iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

sure, since its not a single person planet: everyone should have a say on someone's behaviour toward the climate

[-] TheBiscuitLout@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe by getting onto the list, you earn a Manpad token, and have it delivered during your next flight

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
110 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
488 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net