115
submitted 11 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 49 points 11 months ago

There is a minor conflict between the US and Canada about the demarcation line north of Alaska. Canada argues that it should be an extension line going straight north from the Alaska Yukon border. While the US claims that the line should be perpendicular to the direction of the shoreline at the border. It creates a contested wedge. There's offshore oil and gas there -- which Canada is unlikely to develop (for environmental reasons), but the US may actually develop. On a global scale, it doesn't really matter, but every little bit matters right?

This extension will further extend this conflict. But in the grand scheme of Canada-US relations, it's still relatively minor.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

The whole Arctic Ocean is going to be problematic as:

a) Global warming makes it more accessible and

b) Fossil fuels elsewhere start running out.

The arctic will be the last gasp of the fossil fuel industry. Russia has been making noises about it for years.

https://polarjournal.ch/en/2023/02/21/russias-claim-to-north-pole-territory-officially-confirmed/

https://www.arctictoday.com/russia-gets-approval-for-the-data-behind-much-of-its-arctic-ocean-seabed-claim/

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

On a global scale, it doesn’t really matter, but every little bit matters right?

It's cheaper to just split profits than going to war over it. And yes the US and Canada absolutely would in principle, the UK went to war with Iceland over cod -- because the UK thought that Iceland would just cave, which they didn't, they won the thing. Not everything needs to be high-intensity, cannot be, as war is the continuation of politics by different means and, as see above: It's often just preferable to agree instead of spending resources on fighting. Similarly India and China mutually agreed to forego guns in the Himalayas (among other things, risk of avalanches) and fight with sticks and stones. Dunno if I should count Canada and Denmark (as protector of Greenland) and their liqueur war over Hans' Island, they didn't even earnestly try to get each other drunk.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 11 months ago

I vote for Canada on ecological grounds.

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
115 points (93.9% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2384 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS