168
submitted 10 months ago by Mannivu@feddit.it to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca -2 points 10 months ago

The visitors are encouraged to drive? You sure about that? I mean in most bigger European cities tourists will use public transport. Its not at all convenient to rent a car just for driving within city limits.

If you're not incentivizing them to take transit, you're encouraging them to drive.

Also, you talk about the cost of the ticketing system as if they had to remake it from scratch, they just need to maintain the current one.

Which is not an insignificant expense. Fair gates need to be maintained, residential status verified, etc.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you're not incentivizing them to take transit, you're encouraging them to drive.

Ok, I don't think you have ever been to big European cities, this is not how people have their priorities cut out when visiting. But I can see that discussing this further leads nowhere, since you don't believe me and I don't believe you.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Thanks for your civility. My whole premise is predicated on questions neither of us can answer. You're quite right that I've never been to Europe (only England and Wales as an infant), but I feel my studies of urbanism and transit provide some insight. Thanks for the pleasant chat.

[-] Jomn@jlai.lu 5 points 10 months ago

Honestly, the only tourists that will really use a car are from «close» cities such Marseille or Toulouse. And they will choose the car because the Intercités train service is garbage, which has nothing to do with Montpellier's public transports.

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago

I don't know about France, but the Netherlands requires that everyone register with their local town council, so determining residency here would be a simple matter of showing your ID (which is also required). So that at least should be no extra cost.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Sure, but even that's not cost free as you either have staff/equipment verifying IDs to allow entry to platforms. In the case of roadside stops, you're increasing dwell time to verify IDs, which extends the route time, which means more drivers and vehicles to provide the same service level

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

I think that you misunderstood the requirement. You go to town hall and they give you a transit pass; the same pass they use now. There is nobody checking ID on the transport itself.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Then it's a cost to issue transit passes and check them...

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
168 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
444 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS