202
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Edit: please pay attention to the first two words of this headline. We don't actually know if Trump received a target letter, he could be lying out of his ass to mess with the investigation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The big question is, will "judge" aileen cannon get this case too?

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

No.

She is on the Southern District of Florida, and the crimes of January 6 did not take place in Florida.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well the stolen documents were taken from DC, and yet the case was brought before the Florida Southern District Court, so why not give the stolen documents case to a DC circuit? Not trying to argue, just trying to make sense of it.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those charges aren't really about taking documents. They are about refusing to return them, lying about whether they had all been returned, and possibly showing them to unauthorized individuals. The documents were in Mar-a-lago when this was going on.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The taking of the documents is the least important of the charges. In fact, they didn’t charge him with taking documents. They charged him under the espionage act where he hid defense secrets, obstructed, lied, and conspired, shared those secrets, after numerous attempts by the authorities to retrieve them. And that all took place in Florida. Had they charged him in DC it would have delayed* the trial. The venue was a calculated decision of time vs judge/jury pool.

There’s also a good chance he’ll be charged in NJ for separate crimes regarding those documents since some of them were moved there. Separate case though.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. And so if anyone ever asks "Why weren't Biden or Pence indicted?", you'll know the answer. They didn't lie about their documents and they didn't get in the way when the government took them back.

In case anyone is wondering, "Why was nobody charged for taking them?", the answer is probably intent. Trump, Biden, and Pence could all claim that they weren't responsible for removing the documents. But of those three, only one of them is on tape saying something like, "Yeah, I've still got these secret documents that I probably should have given back". He's the one they indicted.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But held in Florida.

And many of the secondary crimes were also held there.

Rememeber, he’s not being charged with taking them. He’s being charged with keeping them and refusing tk give them back, and storing them improperly

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

For the life of me, I can’t see why the insurrection grand jury would be in florida

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
202 points (95.9% liked)

News

23275 readers
3497 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS