60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TornadoRex@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago

This is dumb. Most likely they just weren’t catalogued correctly because they were rushing stuff to the front lines. Doubtful anything went missing it’s just paperwork errors.

[-] orbit@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Or - and this is heavily documented - the US Military has never passed any audit since they began being audited. This is just part of that.

Doesn't mean we don't support Ukraine. Just means we need to hold the military accountable for the funds provided.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

the US Military has never passed any audit since they began being audited. This is just part of that.

That's mainly because there's a shit ton of agencies in the DOD, and they send money between themselves and non DOD agencies constantly.

If I pay you $100, but we lose the reciept, there's no missing money. Just a missing receipt.

However for those government audits, if we both were part of it then we'd each be off by $100. And rather than cancel those, they add them together and say combined we're "missing" $200

So the public hears about these huge numbers that probably don't matter, and hardly anyone hears the actual number of missing money to know if we really should be mad.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 6 points 8 months ago

I've seen dod finance. The amount of paperwork to move money within an agency is ridiculous. Between is even more. If they don't have a receipt, it's deliberate or gross negligence.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I’ve seen dod finance

If you had "seen" it, you'd know not to say that randomly on a public social media website.

You'd also know what you're talking about...

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 8 months ago

Til being a low level bureaucrat or military member is unheard of and absolutely never talked about online.

[-] orbit@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is a good take but it disregards the realities of the financial recipients being unable to account for funds spent. I agree there are special circumstances but we need to have visibility to those realities as benefactors. Otherwise how can we allocate funds democratically.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If they kept records, how would they get away with diverting so much of the money back into their pockets?

[-] orbit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Lol literally no way to find out because they don't track it and have no reason to do it.

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
60 points (76.8% liked)

World News

38596 readers
2170 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS