398
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Tesla Cybertruck Owners Who Drove 10,000 Miles Say Range Is 164 To 206 Miles::Also, the charging speeds are below par, but on the flip side, the sound system is awesome and the car is “a dream to drive.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 79 points 9 months ago

Why does it look like a car from a PS1 game?

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

StarFox on the SNES has more polygons than that.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

Probably the same reason everything he has named sounds like a 12yo came up with it

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago

Because we live in the version of reality where the worst idea is the best idea and we don’t actually care about anyone’s wellbeing and safety. The car is shaped the way it is to inflict the most fatalities on pedestrians.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And the us traffic safety board is refusing to test it's crash rating because they don't have to. It's so fishy that this is a new stupid design and they don't want to test it. Either Elon paid them off or they refuse to give or sell one to test. I have a feeling it would get a 2 out of 5 stars.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

I think the artist behind Mad Max might have some ideas worth exploring. When in doubt, add more spikes.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Because Musk wanted to make a vehicle out of stainless steel and straight panels are the easiest/cheapest to form.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

Straight panels are much harder to make as every bend and minor imperfection show up. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/13/why-the-cybertruck-is-so-hard-to-manufacture.html

Why do you think cars are never made with straight panels?

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Straight stainless is easier.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered.

Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs.

But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over.

[-] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

Hey Elon stole my plans where I drew this exact thing the very first time I ever tried to draw a car. I think I was 4.

[-] Steve@communick.news 7 points 9 months ago

Are you genuinely asking? Because I thought all these jokes were made when it was first unveiled 5 years ago?

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

And it still looks stupid today

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I mostly see the N64 Rush 2049 car called Venom I think. It was mostly a Lamborghini Diablo. Maybe it just stood out in the sea of rounded futuristic cars.

Side note, I think the one called Euro LX was really just the BMW 6-series concept from the Bengal era. Funny how it landed in a mix of futurism that included a rocket car

[-] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The Lara Crofts boobs comparison is still the most accurate IMO.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And why, after we ridiculed this thing 10 years ago for being a low-poly abomination and then it disappeared from view for two decades, did they suddenly decide to release the thing with apparently zero changes in 2023?

This is a terrible, ridiculed, 10 year old atrocity. How is it being taken seriously? I feel like I’m on crazy pills.

e: number typos

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I don't disagree, except it was 4 years ago that they unveiled the abomination.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

It was definitely previewed at least ten years ago. In my old job as UX designer, we were laughing at it around the office, and I haven’t worked there for 12 years. It may have been a limited preview in design circles, not a public announcement, but the design hasn’t changed.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet).

[-] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
398 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
3991 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS