1520
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

It's pretty funny that Gordon Ramsey is actually a sweet guy and plays up the angry cook guy on TV.

[-] lichtmetzger@feddit.de 39 points 9 months ago

In the UK version of Hell's Kitchen you can see this side of him. In one episode he just hung out at the beach with his whole team and it was so wholesome.

The US show is cut in a way that emphasizes his outbursts, it's much worse.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

Same with kitchen nightmares.

In the US version, we see rage Ramsay

In the UK version we see despair Ramsay

Maybe it's just reflective of the mood of the country

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Eh, this is somewhat true, and he's dug into this a few times. Some is put up for TV, but he's inclined to be annoyed at people that call themselves chefs, take people's money, and serve them sub-par products. In a few shows, like the one with Angela Hartnett where she took over The Connaught, it showed that he's still an angry dude, but that it was needed because he's taking over the restaurant at one of London's finest hotels. Michelin Star places seem to be the same boiling pot of bullying and anger to strive for the best possible quality.

Some chefs, like J Kenji Lopez Alt have called it and him out several times on it, because it's a very damaging practice, and one that spreads throughout the industry from wannabe Ramsay's that thinks intimidation is needed to make food.

I'm sure Ramsay is a lovely guy in person, but I would hate to work for him.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

18 years in restaurants checking in: Gordon Ramsay is not very far from the mean at all. In fact, I'd say he's a mean mean man of average rage, and it's the nature of the industry that does this to us. It's flat-out abusive even in its best implementation, and the far and away vast majority of restaurants are purposefully exploitative. This goes double for back of house. I was usually a server or bartender, though I did work every hourly position at some point in my career. Front of house at least gets compensated more the busier they are. Back of house gets what they get whether they sell two orders of fries in an evening or they spend all shift with ten tickets on the rail and 30 open menus. Back of house also doesn't get paid all that well, outside of a few rockstars. It's a super high stress position, and that stress level is completely unpredictable. Any random Tuesday afternoon you could find yourself behind the line all alone as the third bus pulls into the parking lot. The extremely variable nature of the stress means two things:

  1. You don't cook as a career unless you love turning out great food. You might do a couple years just because you need a job but it's so hard on your mind and body that after a while you literally either love it or leave it.

  2. Eventually everyone in the kitchen becomes what Robert Anton Wilson called "...the walking wounded...slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief." There's a lot of PTSD in kitchens and, because hurt people hurt people, it tends to spread to new people and reinforce itself in veterans. In the highest volume store I ever worked in we used to joke that sexual harassment and bullying were just how we said "Hello". It's not okay, but it's the reality on the ground. It tends to develop spontaneously because of the way restaurants work and once it takes root it's really hard to get rid of.

So the average restaurant worker is half Anthony Bourdain, here for the love of food and people, trying to experience new and great things and build new and great things for other people to experience just out of a general enthusiasm for humanity. He's also half Gordon Ramsay, throwing an overcooked steak back at you because a cow had to die to make it and our guest had to sell a little bit of their life to afford it, so you will fucking respect both of their sacrifices and turn out some good fucking food. It's love, and it's pride, and it's trauma, and it's passion for what is essentially an unrecognized folk art. And if it paid the bills I'd go back in a heartbeat.

You absolutely nailed it.

It's an incredibly intense environment with a culture of accepted abuse (hate that I'm saying that), as well as a lot of exploitation.

His anger in real life is like... Below average of the food industry. Where his TV persona is way up there for entertainment.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

his "putting on a show of being angry for the cameras" is a bit below average tbh. people who've never been in a kitchen find it shocking, and the rest of us are like "well he didn't actually break anything and the idiot sandwich thing was really funny"

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 9 months ago

Linus is also said to be a sweet guy IRL and only became the angry kernel guy on the mailing list.

[-] Norbynorwest@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago

You mean when he's not admitting to felony crimes to advance his career?

Oh no is this going to be one of those moments where a celebrity I think is neat, I suddenly get news about how they're a PoS?

I just learned about Chuck Norris a few months ago and I'm not ready ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
1520 points (97.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
84 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS