78
submitted 1 year ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Contextual_Idiot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

The Canadian government seems to be following Australia's lead. Australia was able to make deals with Google and Meta, so Canada is probably looking for the same thing.

[-] terath@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, key word here is "make deals," which is what Australia ended up doing. They didn't just dictate terms like Canada seems to want to. The entire point of these companies banning news is to remind our government that no, you can't just dictate your terms, you actually have to negotiate. Maybe they will, we'll have to wait and see.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The one thing that makes government different than any other organization is yes they CAN just dictate the terms. That's their whole deal.

[-] terath@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Not against foreign owned companies they cannot. As much as they would love to force these companies to both carry and pay for news, those companies can choose not to carry the news and thus not pay for it. Canada can not force them to do so.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
78 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
457 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS