1256

Alexei Navalny Sacrificed Himself to Show Russia That Putin Is a Monster (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

142 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Navalny’s friends knew he was willing to become a martyr if that’s what it took to stand up to Putin.

Alexei Navalny’s long struggle against President Putin began with a humorous blog and culminated in repeated demonstrations of his willingness to risk his own life. According to the Russian authorities on Friday, he has now died in prison.

Russia’s leading opposition voice has been silenced.

Other dissident figures went into exile or died in mysterious circumstances over the past decade, leaving Navalny as the last national figure with a dedicated following.

Though he had been arrested many times before, Navalny’s defining moment in the eyes of many Russians came after the attempt to assassinate him with Novichok. He recuperated in the sanctuary of a German hospital but chose to defy Putin and return to Russia in January 2021, knowing full well he would end up in prison.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It sadly did end. Now another fucking imperialist is in charge.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_empire

At its peak, their empire was roughly the same size as the British Empire, 35 million square kilometers. Slightly more than half of it was just Russia, though, of course, which makes this a bit of an orange vs apples thing. But USSR definitely had an empire-like thing going on.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -1 points 8 months ago

But USSR definitely had an empire-like thing going on.

... important parts of which were (declared and even attempted) meritocracy, scientific and social progress, and a promise (which seemed realistic enough) for the future of the whole world.

This doesn't have anything in common with any big state's ideology now.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I suppose originally it was, and I do think original goals are important to consider.

Stalin brought an early end to many progressive dreams, though, and it doesn't seem like Soviet Union ever really recovered from his regressive regime.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I meant 60s and 70s.

The point is that even aggressive attitudes of Soviet leadership were constructed very differently.

Politburo really made collective decisions.

The Communist party and the ministries and local councils and all that could function in obscure, weird and undocumented ways, but they did generally follow laws and rules.

I mean ... it really was an empire. Very inefficient and it eventually failed, but still.

Today's Russia is just an entity of a lower order.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Today’s Russia is just an entity of a lower order.

Indeed it is, but in many ways it's just a legacy (even if a deeply warped one) of the earlier. Putin was a KGB man, and repeatedly mentions how he thinks the fall of USSR was one of the greatest geopolitical tragedies.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Anything is a legacy of what was before. I'm just saying that it's not a rebuilt and changed USSR or even its part, it's something new built from the same bricks.

Putin was a KGB man,

Not of the "expected to be anywhere near leadership by intelligence" kind from what I've read.

and repeatedly mentions how he thinks the fall of USSR was one of the greatest geopolitical tragedies.

He repeatedly mentions anything he thinks will make him popular. Loved a few antifascist, centrist and legalist lines too.

BTW, he himself apparently still thinks his power is somehow dependent on popularity, while in fact it's dependent on apathy only at this point.

He worries about what people will think, however weird that may sound.

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Man, Lenin set fire to a good chunk of his own dreams during the Civil War.

The betrayal of the SRs and Makhnovists, the butchering of Kronstadt, the subjugation of local soviets and trade unions to centralized top-down rulership, and nationalization of previously independent cooperatives all helped bring down the dreams of equality and liberty. Lenin created all of the infrastructure that Stalin then used to horrifying ends. IMO this is an inevitable outcome of vanguardism and a "dictatorship of the proletariat", but that is a topic for another day.

Some of the things mentioned above did manage to survive post-Stalin. There was immense scientific progress in the USSR and the education was the best in the world. Everyone got food, though it was poor-quality and standing in line for it was universal (again, post-Stalin).

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Homelessness wasn’t a thing.

Homelessness was illegal in Soviet Union. USA has plenty of problems that are objectively worse in this area, but I'm not sure if just declaring it illegal and sending vagrants to labor camps is a very good solution either.

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Point taken. I will revise my original post. You're right, man. Further reading supports your view. It seems that they just weren't very visible.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024

1256 points (96.5% liked)

World News

38987 readers

1849 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.