284
submitted 9 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

"Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?" Kirk asked.

Kirk, along with his co-hosts Jack Posobiec, Tyler Bowyer and Blake Neff, continued to discuss at what age should children watch the public executions, with one co-host pointing out as young as 12 years old.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ServeTheBeam@lemmy.world 67 points 9 months ago

We can’t let kids see gay things! But watching someone get murdered is totally cool.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

America is a country of violent prudes. There's a reason we rate violent movies lower than movies with "sexual content".

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Yep. Beheading where the head flies all over the place? No problem, 12+.

Hint of a single tit? Freakout, 18+!

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

Pg13 has gone off the rails since I was a kid. Like on-camera gun suicides with chunks, among other things. Meanwhile half the R films I watch don't even have blood anymore blood. Basically pg13 means high violence and R means the tiniest hint that something sexual could maybe happen off screen. I don't get it at all

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

You're forgetting language. Cursing is treated nearly the same as sexual content. Throw a couple fucks in and the movie is rated R even without violence or sexual content.

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I don’t have any fucks left to throw.

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

I went out fuck shopping and there's no fucks left to buy!

[-] Cerbero@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Right one fuck is pg-13, R is 2 or more.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I think it's gotten even more weird because there seems to be a certain brand of feminism (lost track of which wave is anti-porn, and not sure if this is the same group - but, honestly, it's hard to distinguish the outcome from conservative busybodies, if you are going to be honest) seem to go on and on about the "male gaze", so even things like slashers don't have bewbs in them. I guess so they get a PG-13 ratiing even though they may have quite a bit of violence in them (but no T&A, by god!)

These are the same people that harped on things like Game of Thrones, too, for showing bewbs and sometimes a bit of pubes - but apparently being ultraviolent was not a problem.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 9 months ago

I wonder what a flying tit would be rated at.

[-] TakiMinase@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago

That Puritan founding. Funny hats make you crazy.

[-] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Funny hats were made with mercury that makes you crazy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_as_a_hatter

[-] stark@qlemmy.com 1 points 9 months ago

A country founded by prudes... according to Eurotrip.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

A country where a man is forced to make sex to only one woman at a time and one must learn the woman's name beforehand!

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

What? Polyamory is very popular here, especially among men in my area. They're just on the DL with it instead of living authentically.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's a quote from Eurotrip which the person I was responding to referenced.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Rofl! I don't have TV or subscribe to services, hence my confusion. Thanks for the explanation, I am wearing a stupid-wide grin!

[-] whodatdair@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, they need to be shown the consequences of what happens if you do gay things, of course.

If Trump gets back in and they implement that “Project 2025” where they plan to fire 50k government workers and replace them with far right wingnuts, I can envision such a future.

Alito just signaled that they’re not satisfied with just overturning Roe, he’s gunning to overturn Obergefel. I wonder which states it’ll be unsafe to travel through for fear of not being able to see my SO if they get hurt and have to go to the hospital. I wonder if any states will try to ban people with gay marriages from entering.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
284 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS