564
submitted 8 months ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grte@lemmy.ca 82 points 8 months ago

That's exactly how the article suggests setting the maximum.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 36 points 8 months ago

"Wage" is rather poor wording then.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Wage is worthless wording. Most ultra rich don’t have wages - at least not relative to their change in worth. We need to change how taxes fundamentally work.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Anyone with two brain cells can understand that it's a wordplay on "minimum wage" and the implementation of this isn't really going to rely on the narrow definition of wages.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

It seems unwise to rely on the uneducated masses to interpret things correctly. Perhaps clearer communication would be helpful.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

That's why there's a whole text with explanations right below the headline

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

There are more words????

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

As you can see, lots of people don't read those explanations.

Perhaps clearer communication would be beneficial.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
564 points (92.7% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
260 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS