239
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
239 points (98.8% liked)
politics
19107 readers
2675 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Let’s see how much the banks love him now.
Coming soon: a 0% interest loan for 150% of his obligations from a bank owned by a Russian oligarch with a million ties to Putin.
Conspiracy theory I’ll never be able to prove: the new wave of Russian sanctions that Biden enacted last week are an attempt to thwart this outcome.
even if that were legitimately true (and it might well be) would it even be unethical?
Whoever said it would be unethical?
Well, it was initially presented as a conspiracy theory here. So, those are usually unethical.
Are you saying the Loch Ness Monster is unethical?
It's a bit fishy, at the least
Honestly wouldn't mind.
If they're wasting half a billion on Trump's legal bills, that's half a billion that can't be spent bombing Ukrainians.
It would be less than that. He needs to post the full amount in cash or a bond for that amount if he can find someone to issue the bond. Bonds are typically for a fraction of the value, say 10%, of the total. So if Trump could find a bondsman who is willing to issue a $454 million bond for him, he'd only have to pay $45.4 million. In theory, he could get one of those Russian loans for $45 million that he'll never have to repay and then stiff the idiot bondsman when he loses the appeal.
He was just found to be lying though his teeth about his financial situation and the value of the things he uses as colatteral.
Even if some bank where to decide to loan him money, the shareholders of the bank might sue the bank. I can only imagine trump is radioactive for loans.
So his only chance would be from personal loans. And how do we feel about a president with massive personal loans to unnamed billionaires.
High risk means high interest. If he can even get a loan, it'll be very steep.
For a possible future president? Likely at 0.0%
They will make their money back in politcal grift later.
this would be the 'misdemeanors' part of impeachment, yes?
Impeachment doesn’t mean anything if there are more than 33 R senators
Third times a charm?
(naw, you're totally right. I wonder if we could generate some kind of AI deep fake of something degenerate enough to get the Pubies on board?)
(maybe... an AI deepfake of Mike Johnson getting freaky with, ah... somebody or something. Then try 'maga2020' on trump's truth social account and drop it that way... or maybe it's 'maga2024'? Oh, he's screaming, so it's probably MAGA2024)
Nah he will try to value his estates at several billions, making him more than good for it, and hope to get the loans dirt cheap as he always has done.
Like when right outside the court he slandered Jean Carroll again, just after being fined for it!
IDK if he is stupid enough to do that, he might instead value his underpants at several billion, and hope some bank will buy it.
At least all the banks now have real valuations on his properties out in the public record now thanks to court and the court appointed monitors.
Nonono, that's just the valuation for authorities. The valuation for banks is way higher, especially if it's a nice sunny day.
Hey, at least the banks can verify if his underwear is authentic or not by the shit stains 💩
Yes, and Trump claims he has very good genes, that should be worth something too.
You spelled jeans wrong.
goddammit
US banks have refused to do business with him for decades; that's why he had to turn to Deutsche Bank in the first place. And when they balked, he had to turn to the Russians and Saudis.