190
US judge in Texas rules minority business agency must serve all races
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
190 points (98.0% liked)
News
23332 readers
2882 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That's an implementation / corruption issue, then. Fix the root cause, not the symptoms.
Assuming 90% of PoC qualify, and 30% of whites (or whatever the actual numbers are), if everybody has an equal chance at aid based on their wealth, PoC should receive the majority of aid. If that's not happening, I refer you back to point 1.
The root cause is the racism.
Black people are poorer on average because of systemic racism, and they get shut out of benefits not specifically sectioned for them and them alone because of systemic racism.
Poor whites aren't poor because of literal centuries of being treated as literal farm animals, complete with actual husbandry programs when importation became illegal.
Poor whites aren't struggling to find affordable housing because of being specifically excluded from New Deal era housing loans.
Poor whites aren't facing all that on top of being disproportionately likely to just randomly get murdered by the fucking cops.
Poor Whites can afford to sit the fuck down and let the black folks have what was intended for them.
There is no such thing as the White Race. Slavs and Irish are not the same as WASPs.
Yes, so fix the racism. Get rid of the racist officials. Teaching an entire new generation that racism is acceptable if it's against the right colour (sound familiar?) is not the way to go about eliminating racism.
By your logic, they obviously didn't benefit from those policies either. Does it matter WHY they're poor and struggling? Maybe we could just help everybody who's deserving?
Oh my god, why didn’t we think about that? I’m gonna go tell everyone. I’m pretty sure you just fixed everything! Thank you!
Next, I think I’ll just stop being sad so I can stop taking my anti-depressants!
GIven your current idea of the best approach is 'double down on the racism', I felt I had no choice but to start with the basics.
No, all you’ve shown is a profound ignorance of the situation and why affirmative action programs are a part of the solution.
Lifting marginalized communities and peoples by providing them additional support is not racism. Full stop.
Racism has had multi-generational effects. Fixing racism now doesn't eleviate the inequality affecting people whose ancestors were enslaved, beaten, and robbed
Oh, that should be easy.
It's impossible to judge someone's thoughts and reasons for why they do something, but it's easy to enforce a set of rules that makes them do something else.
Do you know what systemic racism is? Do you believe it exists?
I'm a Chinese outside China. Believe me when I say I know very well what systemic racism is. I do not however believe the best way to combat it is by encouraging more discrimination, whoever it is against.
I believe you may think you know what it is, but I don't think you do. Systemic racism is subtle. We likely don't even recognize a good chunk of it yet. Even if we did, a system that assumes equality of opportunity literally systemically perpetuates the effects of racism.
If a scale has $60 on one side and $100 on the other, you will literally never restore the balance by adding money equally on both sides. The best you can do is obscure the imbalance by adding so much money that the scales start to look balanced from a distance.
Now the value of the money means nothing compared to assets (property, denied to minorities historically through policies like redlining), which will hold their value through inflation. Guess who has all the assets? The side that started with $100... so even that doesn't work.
Ultimately, there is no way to restore the balance without the $100 side's feelings getting hurt before because they aren't getting as much. It's not like white folks are being told to move out of their home so a black family can move in. Speaking as a white dude, we can stand to suck it up for a bit.
Systemic racism can be subtle. The Chinese version is blatant. I'm absolutely certain that the previous poster knows quite well what blatant state supported systemic racism looks like, they grew up in such a system. I don't know if that would help or hinder their ability to identify such structures in the subtle ways that the US does it.
Seeing as "white" isn't a race, there is a fundamental problem with your argument.