83
submitted 8 months ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I hear people say that about Nextcloud often, which is part of why I haven't bothered setting it up yet.

Is there a technical reason why it's slow and clunky? Any problematic choices with how it was built?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Run it on a “normal” server and everything is smooth.

Sure until you try with a high end 12 core CPU on NVMe storage all kinds of caching, redis etc. and you find you it doesn't perform particularly better.

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I'm no hardware person but I don't have redis or caching enabled and it works fine

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

It runs fine in a VM with a few cores, 4gb of ram and Sata SSDs

The entire Nextcloud folder is on a network share as well.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
83 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40173 readers
579 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS