83
submitted 8 months ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I hear people say that about Nextcloud often, which is part of why I haven't bothered setting it up yet.

Is there a technical reason why it's slow and clunky? Any problematic choices with how it was built?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Well I only saw problems with about 1TB of small files. I'm not sure if they were actually caused by the volume of the data or because there were multiple using syncing parts of that data as well.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

My setup has no where near that much data. Maybe it gets bogged down with lots of IO.

I will say caching is really important for Nextcloud to be fast

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
83 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40152 readers
570 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS