675
It's true. (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

We didn't built our environments to exclude specifically non-drivers. We are all competing and driving is simply a massive advantage. It also means that places generally don't have to be super close together to have business traffic and therefore benefit more from cheaper real estate.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

yes that is why our suburbs are condensing into chains and big box stores and can barely support themselves, because driving is such a massive advantage to all businesses everywhere.

All sarcasm aside, please just watch this video: Not Just Bikes - How Suburban Development Makes American Cities Poorer [STO2]

If that interests you at all, I highly recommend watching the rest of the strong town series of videos from not just bikes

[-] owen@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah. Because car transportation is massively subsidised and the automotive industry is so influential, modern cities were built for cars instead of people.

Sure, we weren't "targeting non drivers", but we were exclusively building for cars.

We're now reaping what we sowed - cities are now hostile to pedestrians.

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
675 points (87.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1957 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS