this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
1173 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

26307 readers
1508 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 133 points 2 years ago (18 children)

Does anyone actually use touch for its intended purpose? Must be up there with cat.

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 94 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 76 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wtf. All these years I thought 'touch' was reference to Michelangelo's Creation of Adam.

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago

That's beautiful, bro 🥲

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 91 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The intended use of touch is to update the timestamp right?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 100 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah. It could just as well have issued a file not found error when you try to touch a nonexistent file. And we would be none the wiser about what we're missing in the world.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

“Do one thing and do it very well” is the UNIX philosophy after all; if you’re 99% likely to just create that missing file after you get a file not found error, why should touch waste your time?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because now touch does two things.

Without touch, we could "just" use the shell to create files.

: > foo.txt
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Touch does one thing from a “contract” perspective:

Ensure the timestamp of is

[–] dan@upvote.au 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Systemd also does one thing from a contract perspective: run your system

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But this directly goes against that philosophy, since now instead of changing timestamps it's also creating files

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You can pass -c to not create a file, but it does go against the philosophy that it creates them by default instead of that being an option

EDIT: Looking closer into the code, it would appear to maybe be an efficiency thing based on underlying system calls

Without that check, touch just opens a file for writing, with no other filesystem check, and closes it

With that check, touch first checks if the file exists, and then if so opens the file for writing

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 9 points 2 years ago

If you touch -c it should work I guess

[–] zurchpet@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We use it to trigger service restarts.

touch tmp/service-restart.txt

Using monit to detect the timestamp change and do the actual restart command.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is an interesting idea to allow non-root users to restart a service. It looks like this is doable with systemd too. https://superuser.com/a/1531261

[–] zurchpet@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Indeed. Replacing monit with systemd for this job is still on our todo list.

[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

what is cat's use if not seeing whats inside a file?

[–] Navigate 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is short for concatenate, which is to join things together. You can give it multiple inputs and it will output each one directly following the previous. It so happens to also work with just one input.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago
[–] DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bat bat bo-at

Bonbaten-fana fo-fat

Fee-fi-fo-fat

Bat!

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Cat with wings? Isn’t a bat more like a rat with wings?

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

TIL

I never realized. Thanks!

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is to use along with split. e.g.

  1. You take a single large file, say 16GB
  2. Use split to break it into multiple files of 4GB
  3. Now you can transfer it to a FAT32 Removable Flash Drive and transfer it to whatever other computer that doesn't have Ethernet.
  4. Here, you can use cat to combine all files into the original file. (preferably accompanied by a checksum)
[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Doesnt computers do this automatically if you try to copy over a file larger than its per file size limit?

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I sometimes use cat to concatenate files. For example, add a header to a csv file without manually copy and paste it. It’s rare, but at least more frequent than using touch.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 19 points 2 years ago
$ cat file1 > output_file
$ cat file2 >> output_file
$ cat file3 >> output_file

I'm sorry!

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's its intended purpose - combining files together (the opposite of split). See the first line of the man page: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/cat.1.html

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you updated a Django server, you were supposed to touch the settings.py file so the server would know to reload your code. (I haven't used any for a long time, so I don't know if it's still the procedure.)

There are many small things that use it.

[–] alexdeathway@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

it now has a hot reload, How long ago were you using Django?

[–] noproblemmy@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

cat

Ahhhhh, fuck. I'm quite noob with linux. I got into some rabbit hole trying to read the docs. I found 2 man pages, one is cat(1) and the other cat(1p). Apparently the 1p is for POSIX.

If someone could help me understand... As far as I could understand I would normally be concerned with (1), but what would I need to be doing to be affected by (1p)?

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The POSIX standard is more portable. If you are writing scripts for your system, you can use the full features in the main man pages. If you are writing code that you want to run on other Linux systems, maybe with reduced feature sets like a tiny embedded computer or alternates to gnu tools like alpine linux, or even other unixes like the BSDs, you will have a better time if you limit yourself to POSIX-compatible features and options -- any POSIX-compatible Unix-like implementation should be able to run POSIX-compliant code.

This is also why many shell scripts will call #!/bin/sh instead of #!/bin/bash -- sh is more likely to be available on tinier systems than bash.

If you are just writing scripts and commands for your own purposes, or you know they will only be used on full-feature distributions, it's often simpler and more comfortable to use all of the advanced features available on your system.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If you execute a binary without specifying the path to it, it will be searched from the $PATH environment variable, which is a list of places to look for the binary. From left to right, the first found one is returned.

You can use which cat to see what it resolves to and whereis cat to get all possible results.

If you intentionally wants to use a different binary with the same name, you can either directly use its path, or prepend its path to $PATH.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

I used it recently to update the creation date of a bunch of notes. Just wanted them to display in the correct order in Obsidian. Besides that though, always just used it for file creation lol

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know anything about Linux but I do love touching cats

[–] YoorWeb@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

You would love Linux cli.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Cat is actually super useful.

[–] Crow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean, timestamps aren't really all that useful. Really just if you do some stuff with makefiles but even then it's a stretch. I did once use cat for its intended purpose tho, for a report. We split up the individual chapters into their own files so we have an easier time with git stuff, made a script that had an array with the files in the order we wanted, gave it to cat and piped that into pandoc

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Touch is super useful for commands that interact with a file but don't create the file by default. For example, yesterday I needed to copy a file to a remote machine accessible over ssh so I used scp (often known as "secure copy") but needed to touch the file in order to create it before scp would copy into it

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, Nextcloud can't sync files with a timestamp of 0

[–] NaiveBayesian@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yup, stupid zip files and their directories from 1970

[–] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, when you are for example checking if the permissions in the directory are correct, or if you want to check if your nfs export is working. It's one of those commands that once you know it exists, you WILL find a way to use it.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 2 years ago

Well, those aren't really the intended use either.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I use it regularly

load more comments (3 replies)