24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1394 readers
59 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/25/sam-bankman-fried-sentenced-multi-billion-dollar-fraud
SBF sentence gets announced this week. Over/under on 15/45/75 years?
I'm guessing the prosecutor gets something like the 45-50 they were asking for. Madoff got 150 years, though.
(excuse the ignorance, haven't been following this close enough on account of spoons)
40-50y req from prosecutor, wat - what's the story there? were they unsure they could secure more if they asked for[0]? is there some kind of fuckery around max sentencing because of charge class?
[0] as in: since sbf was declared guilty, the sentencing is going to happen regardless, but the value of assigned years is variable, and the assigned value could be below prosecutor request for $legalsystem reasons?[1] [1] I am not a US legal system enjoyer, so I don't have comprehensive knowledge on the minutae of that demented clusterfuck operates
@froztbyte @techtakes
That's a question for PopeHat, wherever he hangs his hat these days. He's a former Federal prosecutor.
for a purely legal reference opinion, probably
but I'm more wondering about the human/social side of the nitty-gritty of the proceedings (on which, by my estimation, our ~esteemed~ notorious @dgerard is far more contextually informed on)
Molly White may have you covered
https://www.citationneeded.news/sam-bankman-frieds-sentencing/
you know, that
esteemed
was meant to be strikethroughlemmy formatting strikes again
kenwhite.bsky.social is popehat for people who are missing his takes on the rico.