303

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13942559

(water is wet and fire is hot).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Infinite@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 months ago

Work on not referring to people as resources.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago
[-] Melkath@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

I'm torn on how to respond to them.

5 years of pleading for a business analyst and or a jr data engineer has become "I need a support resource".

To me a resource is a person or thing that generates value.

I dont see "support resource" as a dehumanizing or offensive phrasing.

I might live to change my tune though... if I can get some support resources in my life.

[-] TheBeege@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I'd argue it depends on context. When it comes to corporate budgeting, 'resource' is appropriate, as it could be a contracted company, a tool, or an individual. When it comes to actual manpower, I think referring by title is reasonable.

But in the context of hiring and HR, "resource" is the only term they understand, especially if there is trouble making the ROI clear

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
303 points (97.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9720 readers
607 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS