294
submitted 6 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Published today in a JAMA Health Forum research letter, policy researchers from the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health and Boston University show how the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling affected preferences for permanent contraception among males and females between the ages of 18 to 30. It’s the first study to assess how the Dobbs ruling affected both females and male interest in permanent contraception procedures. What the researchers found was that despite all the attention on male vasectomies post-Dobbs, the rise in tubal sterilizations among females was twice as high as the increase among vasectomies in males.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago

I assume that means tubal ligations will be the next thing Republicans make illegal.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

Don't have to in Texas and Oklahoma a woman can't legally get one without having at least 3 kids or being a certain age. Think over 25 to 30. All GOP have to do s m extend that range.

[-] GoTeamBoobies@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Even as a male in the South I had to go through a few hoops to get a vasectomy and the appointments were specifically months apart so I'd have more time to "reconsider"

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Same and already had 3 kids and they still made me jump through hoops. But Planned Parenthood did pay for mine. Something men everywhere need to look into. Another reason conservative attack them. We should defend Planned Parenthood.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 6 months ago
[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Tubal ligations are already regulated in some red states. There are age and childbirth history requirements. A young woman in these states cannot just "decide" to have the procedure. She must meet criteria set by conservatives.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Fucking atrocious. What do these red states actually produce?? Only two things I can think of are Texas instruments and mouser electronics.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Can you confirm that these are state level requirements and not just doctors forcing their opinions on their patients? I was under the impression it was just a thing certain doctors did.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

My old coworker who lived in AZ was 21 and couldn't get her tubes tied until some certain age. I don't remember if it's the doctor's office or the law.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

I don’t remember if it’s the doctor’s office or the law.

Most of the time it's the individual doctors. For example, my wife had to shop around for a hysterectomy to find a doctor willing to do it, despite multiple medical conditions related to her reproductive system that would be resolved by it, and despite being told by several of the same doctors that she was probably never able to have children. Most of them refusing because she hadn't had any children, despite also claiming she couldn't in the first place.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately, I'm betting they've had that idea for quite some time.

They already are saying they want to go after contraception.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Arg..... Great.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
294 points (97.1% liked)

News

23267 readers
3013 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS