325

U.S., Not Israel, Shot Down Most Iran Drones and Missiles (theintercept.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The United States shot down more drones and missiles than Israel did on Saturday night during Iran’s attack, The Intercept can report.

More than half of Iran’s weapons were destroyed by U.S. aircraft and missiles before they ever reached Israel. In fact, by commanding a multinational air defense operation and scrambling American fighter jets, this was a U.S. military triumph.

The extent of the U.S. military operation is unbeknownst to the American public, but the Pentagon coordinated a multination, regionwide defense extending from northern Iraq to the southern Persian Gulf on Saturday. During the operation, the U.S., U.K., France, and Jordan all shot down the majority of Iranian drones and missiles. In fact, where U.S. aircraft originated from has not been officially announced, an omission that has been repeated by the mainstream media. Additionally, the role of Saudi Arabia is unclear, both as a base for the United States and in terms of any actions by the Saudi military.

“U.S. intelligence estimates that half of the weapons fired by Iran failed upon launch or in flight due to technical issues,” a U.S. Air Force senior officer told The Intercept. Of the remaining 160 or so, the U.S. shot down the majority, the officer said. The officer was granted anonymity to speak about sensitive operational matters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -9 points 8 months ago

Your tax dollars are shielding nazi military targets from retaliation, whilst arming them to commit genocide.

This wasnt saving lives, it was saving Israeli soldiers.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If Israel and Iran ended up in a real fight (which is the result of this attack succeeding) Palestine would have been hit really hard really fast. There's no way they end up risking leaving Palestine in a position to fight back while they send resources elsewhere.

Sure, it was retaliation, but the result would have been horrible for so many innocent people.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 months ago

Israel has committed to responding anyway so what was acomplished other then enriching weappns manufacturers?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, they said they'll respond. We'll see if it means anything... Words are cheap.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 8 months ago

You think the nation committing genocide is bluffing about striking a target whos embassy they already struck?

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

“If you stand up to the nazis you’re actually helping the holocaust”. Who the fuck upvotes this stupid shit? But sure it’s everyone else who’s the real propagandist 🙄

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah... not even remotely a reasonable argument. We didn't know the holocaust was ongoing (at least, not the form of it) when we went to war with Germany. Also, Germany did kill a lot more of their prisoners as the war took it's toll and they became a liability which, if anything, supports my point. Not to say we shouldn't have fought the nazis, but that's not why we fought them anyway.

Also, Iran didn't do this to help Palestinians. They did I'd because Israel attack their embassy. It wouldn't have stopped the genocide no matter what and only could have made it worse. They wouldn't be fighting them because they're Nazis. They'd be fighting them because they want revenge.

Who upvotes your zero-thought comments? (I guess no one luckily.)

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024

325 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39375 readers

2014 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.