289
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

It's from an era in US politics where there was DEEP suspicion of literally any position being assigned via appointment instead of by a more "accountable to the public" election. Plenty of state judiciary positions are elected as well, and the crowning political achievement of the movement was a constitutional amendment that opened US senate seats to election instead of appointment by state legislature, which is what they had been traditionally.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

We should have retained or even amped that suspicion. Look at what SCOTUS has become, just an extension of the major political party's power.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Nah, elected judgeships have been disastrous for the states that implement them. Life term with no reasonable means to punish or remove them whenever they fuck around though, that ought to be corrected and then some.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
289 points (99.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17069 readers
185 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS