426
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 82 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

His name was Ignaz Semmelweis, and they threw him in a mental institution. He was trying to get doctors to wash their hands in between handling corpses and doing surgery, and they got super offended about it.

Edit: I AM LYING! Partly. Semmelweis discovered illnesses caused by bacteria, but he didn't understand that they were caused by microbes, or the mechanism at work. He just was able to piece enough of it together to test empirically that if the doctors washed their hands, then people didn't get sick in the same way that they did if the hands had corpse-goo on them. Linking him to specifically understanding that tiny little creatures were everywhere was a little bit misleading thing for me to do.

Also, they were usually delivering babies, not doing "surgery" in the modern sense of opening people up and poking around in them.

The rest of what I said is true.

[-] NecroParagon@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago

"A gentleman's hands could never be dirty!"

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 7 points 5 months ago

He made them scrub with bleach water until he couldn't smell corpse smell anymore.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Wait. For real? They had so much bacteria on their hands that they smelled of the dead, and they were going right into surgery with live humans? Damn, surgery must have been a death sentence back then.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 4 points 5 months ago

Not just surgery, but they were also working in labor and delivery, so they were getting all that on mothers and their newborn babies.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

They were practicing surgery on cadavers between deliveries. Gotta keep your skills up during your stint in maternity

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was the first person to observe microbes. Semmelweis deserves immense credit for trying to convince people to wash their hands, but he didn't observe microbes and believed in corpse particles. (⌐■_■)

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah. I was telling a fib for comedic effect. Semmelweis is actually a lot more impressive, to me, because he was able to deduce that something important was going on and what the solution was, without having any idea what the mechanism might be, simply from observing and following the data. He didn't need to know the details to know it was a problem; he just trusted the evidence without needing to have a narrative built up in his head to attach it to.

Also, once he realized it was killing people, he wouldn't shut up about it until they literally had to kill him to make him stop. That puts him over the line from good scientist to hero, to me.

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Not arguing with that, but clearly people seem to believe you and think he discovered microbes, which he didn't. The truth is more impressive anyways, no?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 5 months ago

I edited it to add a correction. I shouldn't fib for the sake of making a more entertaining link to the posting, maybe.

[-] Lizardking27@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe strikethrough the first part where you credit semmelweis with the discovery. And no, a convenient lie is never better than a complicated truth. It may seem harmless to you but you've just created misinformation and disseminated it to the public.

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Cheers, comrade.

[-] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

yeah, the idea didn't take off until the previous generation of doctors died. it's a fact that often both encourages and discourages me.

even doctors were too stubborn to accept they may have been wrong about something so important, no matter the evidence. however, even those that are so stubborn that they'll take it to the grave will eventually be passed up by a new generation who has known of this idea since before they were born. at worst, this kind of stubbornnes is only likely to stall progress for 2 generations.

still, millions of people died because humans are stubborn.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 5 months ago

That is the TL;DR of Thomas Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolutions." It is almost universal that when a new way of looking at the world comes along, very few people are persuaded to adopt it on an individual level. The consensus view generally stays the same until enough scientists who grew up with the old model die, that the ones remaining are outnumbered by new scientists who grew up with the new model.

It is bleakly comic, and there is surely some sort of productive lesson there, but I don't know what it is.

[-] subtext@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I’m hopeful this will be how we solve racism and intolerance… hopefully as enough people are brought up the right way, we will eventually move past the hatred in the world today.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
426 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
3002 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS