550
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 92 points 4 months ago

Fallout 5 is going to suck

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 86 points 4 months ago

Fallout 4 sucked, too.

Its a fun shooter game, but its not a fallout. Throwing supermutants into a game doesnt make it a Fallout. Especially with how they fucked SPECIAL.

Fallout TV is probably the last decent product from Bethesda, and I'd wager thats only cause Bethesda isnt in charge of writing.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 4 months ago

Fallout 4 is like 4 different games crammed into a trench coat.

  • high emotion story game. Go rescue your child!
  • high action shooter. Boom! Headshot!
  • stats driven RPG. That naked bandit is level 40 so you can't kill him even if you shotgun his face
  • settlement management game. Build and decorate a little town! Set up trade routes!

All of these are kind of badly done, and mashing them all together didn't make something greater than the parts.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

And the only aspect thats any good is the shooter part. Cause it is a fun shooter. Especially at higher levels with more exotic weapons.

But the story is shit

The RPG Elements.. the SPECIAL/Stats were shit on and ruined to enable some vague idea of nearly infinite growth within an uncapped level system.

and the settlement building is somehow worse than how a New Vegas mod managed to do it.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fallout 3's world doesn't feel like Fallout but the tone of the writing comes close.

Fallout 4's tone and writing doesn't feel like Fallout, but the world does.

New Vegas is the only 3D Fallout game that feels like Fallout in both the world and the writing.

I can almost guarantee that unless Josh Sawyer and the other original talent that made 1, 2, and tactics that also worked on New Vegas are working on it, it will never feel like a true Fallout game.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I would love for Obsidian to get another crack at Fallout, but I don't think they are the only ones capable of making a good fallout game (though they would undoubtly be the best).

It just takes passion for the property, and a vested interest in the world. Something Bethesda is clearly lacking. Bethesda seems to be in the phase of "throw darts at a bunch of sticky notes on the wall" of trying to figure out how to make a game, and it just leads to a disjointed experience.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

For me it's the fundamental difference in design philosophy. Bethesda does power fantasies, which works great for TES, but not for Fallout. You should be barely scraping by, not making the wasteland your bitch.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Obsidian is off doing things and making games better than Fallout, they’d only come back because their studio isn’t extremely profitable and needs the cash.

Really though, please just go buy their games and play them. Outer Worlds got slated as pretty average but I’m still really excited to play that and Outer Worlds 2.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I liked Outer Worlds, but while I do see some "NV magic" there, it feels like both Bethesda AND Obsidian are no longer the same companies that they once were. Obsidian are still quietly putting out some solid games...but not to the same quality of two generations prior.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Outer Worlds is a great, fun game.

The only bad thing about it is idiot gamers heard the basic premise, and that Obsidian was making it, and immediately stroked their hype boners up over "OMG NEW VEGAS IN SPACE!" when it was nothing of the sort.

[-] Famko@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The perk system was fine imo, but the fact that attributes (except for charisma) did not influence dialogue at all was extremely disappointing.

Roleplay opportunities were traded in for a better gunplay experience. It became an FPS, not an RPG.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

Look the perk system was bad but it’s wasn’t Fallout New Vegas bad. It was okay for a Fallout game but they probably should’ve done level ups by doing each 5 levels gives you 2 SPECIAL points to spend rather than spending normal points on the core stats.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Eh, I liked it better than 3.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

talk about damning with faint praise..

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I had fun with both. Fallout 4's flaws are still there, but if you're going to make a punching bag out of one of them, 4 is a better game than 3, IMO.

[-] Zoot@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

Better than 3 maybe, but doesn't even hold a candle to New Vegas. Hell, id argue 3 with NV's engine is leagues better.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No ones disagreeing with that.

Fallout 3 was all around an inferior game. Not just an inferior fallout, but an inferior game, compared to 4.

Mostly cause Fallout 3 was a disjointed mess.

But just because Fallout 4 is better by comparison, Doesnt mean fallout 4 is good.

I hate beets. But give me the choice between a bowl of shit and a bowl of beets, and put a gun to my head? I'll eat the beets gladly and happily. Doesnt mean I love them.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Neither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn't tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

because Fallout 3 is at least fallout-ish despite its horrible writing, story, and world building.

4 is just a shooter game with Vault Tec and Super mutants thrown into it.

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

As an RPG player, people kept saying I should play Fallout, but I never have because it always looked more like a shooter than an RPG, and I want to play an actual RPG, not a shooter with RPG elements (especially because I despise shooters).

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Play 1 and 2 if you dont mind isometric, cause they are a definitive roleplay experience.

and New Vegas if you gotta have that 3d.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Then play Fallout 1, 2, and New Vegas.

[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In all the previous shooter Fallouts, you can basically use VATS to never have to aim yourself if that's what you want to do (or melee build!), it's like an auto-aimer. You won't miss that much and maybe that way you can enjoy the universe.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

I hate modern gaming. Opinions aren’t allowed to be held. I don’t like this thing so ITS THE WORST OF THAT THING

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I hate having discussions. Opinions aren't allowed to be held because theres always some entitled ass that has to come in and misrepresent what everyones saying so they can fulfill their personal fantasy of being offended and attacked.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Once you take high school English your teacher will tell you not to write "in my opinion" in front of everything you write because it is unnecessary. Of course it is your option, you said it.

Someone with basic logic can extrapolate from that that if someone says something like "Fallout 4 is bad" that is clearly someone presenting an opinion and not an objective truth.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Only if you don't buy the Season 1 Vault-Tec Access Pass for $49.99. Imagine not doing that and then not ever being able to get your Overpowered Armor at pass level 5. You would absolutely be ruining it for yourself by not investing into the seasonal passes.

[-] caut_R@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] justaderp@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Crypto would at least offer a non-zero chance of ROI.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
550 points (97.4% liked)

Games

32447 readers
1248 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS