1649
I can't disagree.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
1649 points (98.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
5837 readers
1452 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
By majority it's 100%, physics exists and the time required to maneuver in being capable of turning or lane changing is plenty to clearly signal what it will do. The reality is that if you need turn signals you are bad at driving and should not drive. Most humans are not capable and cars should not be how the majority of people get around.
Why exactly do you think cars have turn signals? Was it on a whim? Did people think it looked nice?
Keep up the cope, you shouldn't be driving.
Again, why do cars have turn signals?
You know the answer, why can't you admit it?
Well I thought the answer was to avoid crashes by signalling to people behind you that you're about to turn.
But you're claiming that's not the case.
So why do cars have turn signals?
I am not psychic, sorry.
I'm saying that if you need signals to reduce the risk of crashing you shouldn't drive, which is probably 98% of humans. That is the vast majority of people should drive.
Okay, well good luck convincing people not to go to work or the supermarket in places without robust public transportation unless they have a bicycle and it isn't dangerously cold or dangerously hot outside.