590

Food safety scandal rocks China as report claims cooking oil carried in same trucks as fuel (www.cnn.com)

submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Public outrage is mounting in China over allegations that a major state-owned food company has been cutting costs by using the same tankers to carry fuel and cooking oil – without cleaning them in between.

The scandal, which implicates China’s largest grain storage and transport company Sinograin, and private conglomerate Hopefull Grain and Oil Group, has raised concerns of food contamination in a country rocked in recent decades by a string of food and drug safety scares – and evoked harsh criticism from Chinese state media.

It was an “open secret” in the transport industry that the tankers were doing double duty, according to a report in the state-linked outlet Beijing News last week, which alleged that trucks carrying certain fuel or chemical liquids were also used to transport edible liquids such as cooking oil, syrup and soybean oil, without proper cleaning procedures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nooooo, it's all Western lies!

lemmy tankies

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

I don’t consider myself a tankie, but I’ve been called one here, and I don’t think it’s a lie.

[+] Objection@lemmy.ml -17 points 4 months ago

Nobody's denying this, there's plenty of Chinese sources reporting on it.

Funny how even when you actually have a true story to talk about you can't resist making shit up.

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

Can't find this posted in !worldnews@lemmy.ml. Can you link to one?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Posted it myself, just now, just for you.

To be clear, what you're suggesting is that stories that the Chinese government is actively talking about would be censored on lemmy.ml. Let's see if that's true! Can't wait to find out!

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 months ago

Nice. I am not really suggesting that they are being actively silenced, since I do see them there from time to time. What I do notice is that stories that are critical of China always get zero or barely any engagement.

Not really a good indicator of lemmy.ml's willingness to discuss China's flaws. This is in comparison to the wall of text that love to comment whenever it comes to defending China or blaming the western countries.

We'll see how many lemmy.ml users comment on your post this time.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The claim I'm disputing is that people would deny that this is happening, not that they're insufficiently critical according to your standards. I'm not interested in evaluating that purely subjective claim (a discussion in which the goalposts could easily be shifted all over the place), what I'm interested in is disproving the objectively false claim that lemmy tankies deny this specific story happening.

The fact of the matter is that the person I responded to lied. That's all I'm saying. And for pointing out that objectively true fact, rather than anyone who disagreed supplying evidence, they just downvoted me, because apparently they think popularity is a substitute for truth.

[-] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

Because it's easier to call anything that disagrees with your world view as "lies" than to accept that the own world view is wrong.

Tankies are the masters of rejecting reality.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

Well, since we have a disagreement about what's true, then there's one surefire way to settle it, right? Evidence. If you're saying that I'm lying and rejecting reality, surely you can point me to evidence that I'm wrong, right? So link me to the comments you saw of people denying this story.

Oh wait, you can't, because it didn't happen. Because y'all make shit up about us all the time and never have the receipts, because fundamentally, we believe in basing our beliefs on evidence and you do not.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

And when that evidence leads you to be right about world events like Trump, capitalism, and the rise of fascism, do you apologize for being right? No, you rub it in everyone else’s faces, and this makes me angry and frustrated. Can you not be nicer about being right?

[-] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

we believe in basing our beliefs on evidence

Shit made me laugh, good one.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

And yet, still zero evidence 🤔

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024

590 points (98.5% liked)

World News

38979 readers

2227 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.