649
submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 212 points 5 months ago

I'm sad it's news when a president/presidential candidate announces something totally reasonable.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 86 points 5 months ago

I’m always disappointed hearing news about Biden. So boring and normal. Where did my emotional rollercoaster of reading the news when Trump was president go?

Dark brandon better beat that facist dumbass come november though.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He probably would’ve announced this anyway, even if politics were much more normal than they are now. The thing is, it wouldn’t have been so newsworthy. It would’ve just been a normal, reassuring statement that we all expected to hear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 186 points 5 months ago

I think this action likely lowers Hunter Biden's chances of winning the presidency to zero for 2024. Not that Hunter Biden is even running for President, but from everything the GOP say, they certainly think he is.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

Impeach Hunter Biden!

[-] credo@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

I dunno. Perhaps the GOP will vote for him if he’s convicted? They seem to go for that sort of thing.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 15 points 5 months ago

Idk, have you tried showing his dick to a bunch of people, in the fucking halls of congress?

I don’t like this timeline

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 145 points 5 months ago

I'm just waiting for the first republican to criticize Biden for not caring about his son enough to pardon him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 80 points 5 months ago

Cool. But you legally can. But you probably shouldn't.

Okay. Cool. Good call.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 53 points 5 months ago

honestly the 'pardon' ability needs to go away completely. maybe it made sense before, and/or wasnt abused, but now it just seems prepped to be a tool to release your fellow felons in crime.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

Clemency is a useful tool, it just needs reform. Some states require it to go through a committee rather than just handing the power to a single official. There are probably other ways to curtail abuse as well.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 months ago

That's only if criminals are elected. Biden used the pardon in 2022 and 2023 to pardon many minor weed related offenses.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

It's still insane that politicians are involved AT ALL in the justice system.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The pardon is a last-ditch effort at justice. I'm fine with it.

POTUS can only waive off on federal crimes, the states still have hold on their own convictions. And even then, the governor can pardon.

Even if abused now and again, it's still good for the broader system.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

They can be useful for things like spy exchanges, but I do agree the system as it exists is ripe for abuse

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Blackout@kbin.run 73 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Donald Trump announced shortly after that he too would never pardon his son Eric. He was quoted as saying "I never liked that kid."

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 17 points 5 months ago

"I don't care for Eric."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 69 points 5 months ago

I feel like if the shoe was on the other foot (Don Jr in trouble) Trump is bitch and moan that it was politically motivated and a witch hunt and then pardon him.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Just like that moron did with other criminals that should not have been pardoned. BTW now that that piece of shit is a convicted felon, we should start to undo anything he ever touched while in office. All those pardons he did, send them the fuck back to prison. Just like how crooked cops have their previous cases under scrutiny.

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah! Time for Afghanistan 2! /j But for real, we can't just broad brush this thing. While most of it was shit, probably several things were decent things that got through in spite of the administration's ineptitude.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

You realize the office of the US President is involved in important things in the world, and isn’t just a vehicle for revenge against a former President?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago

Feels like he'd only act if was Ivanka or something that would also cause trouble for him. Trump isn't afraid of dumping anyone

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago

Republicans will attack him either way.

Pardons Hunter:
"Biden is abusing the legal process for his son! Biden crime family! Reeeeee!!!"

Refuses pardon:
"Biden doesn't even love his son enough to pardon him! Reeeeeee!!!"

[-] msage@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago

Which is why there is no dialogue with people arguing in bad faith.

And we as a society need to recognise that, and act accordingly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

As a semi competent politician its obvious 1) you have to say this and 2) you do your upsetting pardons after the election

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

He won't need to. They're in the wealthy class so the son won't get much jail time if any. Nobody interested in hiring him would give a fuck about this conviction.

We have a two-tier system. It has been obvious for a while, but Donald getting $1,000 scoldings for sending Trumpanzees after the court's staff and family has shone a spotlight on the discrepancy.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

There's always been a 2-tier system, through all nations and all times.

One of my favorite parts of Noble House, set in 1840s Hong Kong, was a Chinese guy disgusted with the English notion of "equal under the law". "Of course there are different laws for the rich and poor! Why else would I strive to be rich?!"

I think on that now and again.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

"Some day I might be rich, and then people like me better watch their step!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago

Literally the only answer to this question, though. He can't say he will pardon him, politically it would be terrible and it might impact the trial itself. And he can wait until after the election and pardon him then, even though it will mean he was lying now.

I don't think this comment is particularly newsworthy.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

It's newsworthy when Trump is out here saying that he's going to go scorched earth on anyone who has ever wronged him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Fox News: "Biden weaponizing justice department against own son!"

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

Eh, I'd do it on the last day for grins.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

If he loses then he definitely should, one last fuck you to Trump since our boy Joe won't get another chance.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

This. He should have said, “I’ll only pardon my son if I lose the election. Voters, it’s in your hands now.”

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Day after the election.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 5 months ago

Does he need to for what is likely to result in the standard well-to-do white guy punishment of a small fine and community service?

And when he does, watch a bunch of other rich white guys complain that he's only being let off because he's the president's son.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

He was only investigated because he's the president's son

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

Why does Joe Biden not simply say the Deep State arrested his Son and then Pardon him and Blame any and all NEGATIVE Media on the Deep State too?

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Biden's voters aren't dimwitted cultists.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The dude bought a gun while high off his ass on crack. If it were anyone else, the Dems would be up in arms about the person not being arrested while the Republicans would be defending his right to bear arms. I'm not seeing too many people saying Hunter should be let free.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I'm not saying he should be let free, but I am saying they're clearly seeking a disproportionate penalty than what most people get, because it's politically motivated.

That could never happen in America, come on now

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

Integrity. Something the republikkklowns have never heard of.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
649 points (98.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS