278
Is it me or did impeach change from "breaking the law" to "I don't like your opinion so I'm going to get you fired?"
Yup, that switch was in 1998.
But what does The Undertaker throwing Mankind off of hell in a cell have to do with it? /S
Seriously though for anyone not following along at home - 1998 was the Clinton impeachment, Monica Lewinsky hearings, etc.
That poor poor cigar…
Yeah read it trying to find what happens and it’s just cause she stopped the gerrymandering
She didn’t stop it. She hasn’t heard a single case; but she did express an opinion on gerrymandering being bad, which likely got her elected, and refuses to recuse herself from cases on it. Basically the state republicans want to call it a conflict of interest, and then impeach; even though the bench (conservative majority at the time) wrote rules specifically to stop them needing to recuse in this way, several years back.
What’s worse is under WI they don’t need to actually have a trial to cause havoc. All they need to do is start a proceeding; then wait. She’ll be suspended from adjudicating at that point AND the governor can’t nominate a replacement.
Total, unashamed, politick. Imagine being this afraid of black voters in 2023.
Jesus Christ is so much worse. Wtf is wrong with that party.
That’s the neat part; when you control the legislature, you can make your own laws.
And in the case of this state Supreme Court Justice, it's not even "get you fired." Republicans know that their firing effort will fail, but until the state Senate holds the hearing the Justice isn't allowed to rule on cases.
So Republicans aren't even firing this justice, but putting her in limbo until the cases that the Republicans want are decided. Only after those cases are decided in the Republicans' favor will they drop the impeachment charges.
Of course, if this is successful, all they need to do is impeach justices to ensure favorable results any time a case comes up that threatens Republican power. Impeach enough left leaning justices and the Republicans could even ensure a hard right verdict.
More like “you won’t let me break the law so I’m going to get you fired or face fraudulent criminal charges for doing your job”
Everything Republicans do is driven by the fear of, jealousy of, or desire to get power.
I call it the three S system of republicanism. Scared, stupid or selfish. You don't need to be all three, but you're certainly one of them.
Through algebraic reduction, you can just use the term “shit.”
Lowest common denominator.
shit has more uses though. kinda mean to compare shit to whatever they are..
Republicans typically have SS at least - tbd on third S
"Legislative edge" is a cute name for gerrymandering
"Legislative Shank" would be much more appropriate
Was... anyone under the impression that this was for any other reason?
So how can we counter this? Can we as citizens mass sue the Republicans instead, thus holding them up in court before she is held up? We need her to fix the maps before 2024.
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
278 points (97.3% liked)
politics
19104 readers
2710 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS