166
submitted 4 months ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spitzspot 70 points 4 months ago
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 42 points 4 months ago
[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I gotta give you a hand, y’all did a great job with these.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

her vaping attracts bears.

[-] kometes@lemmy.world 68 points 4 months ago

Colorado, this is Florida speaking. What is wrong with you?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] settxy@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

Ok, as someone from Colorado, District 4 is super fucking rural... Think 23.3 people per square mile (District 1 is Denver, 4,678 people per square mile). These people are Trump people, and Boebert is a Trump bootlicker, this is not a surprise. She changed districts because she knew she couldn't win her old district.

Colorado has 8 districts, so this is the result of 1/8 of the population, and easily the most red. This is not a representation of Colorado, Colorado is firmly blue and most of us fucking hate her guts.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Weird i assumed it was some kinky voyeuristic part of the country that gets off on public sex acts

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't understand how the system in the US works at all. It seems like a very small amount of people with a very specific background vote on people. So there's a ton of people getting elected all the time. But somehow the people who are elected make international news all the time? They seem very much not important and only represent a small part of the population.

Am I missing something? Why are these clowns like Bobo The Clown and Magic The Gathering getting so much attention? Who cares what some random idiots do, if they don't actually have that much power to begin with.

[-] settxy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You're right! If the Republicans had firm control over the house, these shit heads wouldn't have the power they do. However, the current house has a razor thin margin, 213 Democrats and 222 Republicans, so losing 5 Republicans and they can't pass anything. This has given that small portion of ultra right wing reps (Boebert, MTG, Gaetz, etc.) a ton of power over the Republican Party.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 4 points 4 months ago

The more I learn about American politics, the more I think it's the dumbest shit ever.

[-] leidkultur@lemmy.one 3 points 4 months ago

Extreme politicians having more leverage, in situations where the lead of the majoritiy party is very thin, is actually very common in most democracies.

The specific stupidity of the American democracy is the „winner takes it all“ rule which leads to a two party system.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

You are correct.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The major problem is the way that rural populations are privileged in the ways they influence political outcomes. Of course, they get raw-dogged (economically) as a result of their stupid choices, but hey, they got to "own the libs" by inflicting assholes like beetlebert on the rest of us.

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

As a district 4 resident I'll add some more context (and reason why we need ranked choice voting nationally). The Republican primary was packed, with 6 total candidates. Boebert only got 43% of the vote, and the next closest was Sonnenberg at 13%. The non-MAGA conservatives spread their votes across all the other candidates. With ranked choice, it would be a much closer margin. I'm not saying she would have lost, but over 50% of voting repubs wanted someone else over Boebert.

The "good" news is Boebert is pooling poorly vs Dems in the district, which means we have a chance to flip district 4 blue in November.

This page has the election results https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-primary-elections/colorado-us-house-district-4-results

And heres the 538 page for CO district 4. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/house/2024/colorado/4/

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 60 points 4 months ago

That's because PUBLIC HANDJOBS are EXACTLY what Jesus Preached!

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 42 points 4 months ago

At least her cat fights with MTG are always a good reminder of how much of a cesspool the Republican Party really is.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that's great for some sleazy talk/[un] reality show. Not so great in government offices.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I don't recall ever seeing Bobo and mtg both at the same time... pretty sure they're just one Nazi who occasionally dons a wig and glasses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago

That's embarrassing for Colorado

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

On the other hand, this is a clear minority of Colorado. The state has turned solid blue over the past decade. This largely rural district no longer represents Colorado as a state. Much like MTG's largely rural district in Georgia no longer represents Georgia as a state.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 36 points 4 months ago

What the fuck is wrong with America?

[-] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In a word: Conservativism.

[...] we can also trace a longer structural change in the imagination of the right: namely, the gradual acceptance of the entrance of the masses onto the political stage. From Hobbes to the slaveholders to the neoconservatives, the right has grown increasingly aware that any successful defense of the old regime must incorporate the lower orders in some capacity other than as underlings or starstruck fans. The masses must either be able to locate themselves symbolically in the ruling class or be provided with real opportunities to become faux aristocrats in the family, the factory, and the field. The former path makes for an upside-down populism, in which the lowest of the low see themselves projected in the highest of the high; the latter makes for a democratic feudalism, in which the husband or supervisor or white man plays the part of a lord.

-The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism From Edmund Burke to Donald Trump, by Corey Robin

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] DBT@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago

How are so many people so incredibly stupid lol

[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 40 points 4 months ago

I'm sure your question was rhetorical, but for those listening from the back: Decades of intentionally under-funding public education, for a start.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

And go back even further, exposure to lead fumes from leaded gas in cars made an entire generation incapable of complex logical thought.

[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

True. I literally think of that most days when I see older folks irrationally freak out at the smallest inconvenience. Not that this happens to most old folks, it's just really remarkable when you do witness it. It's really sad that they can't control it, just too bad about the ones who gained power and used it to fuck everyone else over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

They were registered as "Republican" for the primary, so they draw from the two-digit IQ crowd already.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Fox addiction.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

People actually want that shit. God damn.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 28 points 4 months ago

Name recognition is a hell of a thing. It explains why shitty incumbents consistently get re-elected. Also, voters are so fucking stupid.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Also, voters are so fucking stupid.

Especially if they already have a Republican mindset.

[-] TheHottub@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

I'm trying really hard to keep the faith in my fellow Americans. This really makes it hard. 😩

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

The district is extremely rural and Republican and the opposition to Boebert were unable to coalesce around any one candidate, thus splitting the slightly less crazy vote. Let's be clear here though, none of the other candidates were good picks either.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I'm so glad she got a happy ending.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 4 months ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Did she promise a handy to everyone?

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

What the actual fuck ?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
166 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS