70

Artist behind controversial piece in Linz cathedral says vandalism shows there are still ‘people who question women’s right to their own bodies’

Vandals have beheaded a sculpture of the Virgin Mary giving birth to Jesus on display in the cathedral in the Austrian city of Linz. The work had drawn criticism from some Catholics, who said it was blasphemous.

The sculpture had been on view at the St Mary Cathedral, Austria’s largest, as part of an art installation about women’s roles, family images and gender equality, the Linz diocese said in a statement. It said the vandalism, which occurred on Monday, had been reported to police.

The identity of the vandals was unknown. But Alexander Tschugguel, an Austrian traditionalist Catholic responsible for the so-called “Pachamama” act of vandalism during the Vatican’s 2019 Amazon synod, said in a social media post on Tuesday that he had been contacted by those responsible.

Tschugguel praised the “Hero of Linz” and posted what he said was a statement from the anonymous vandal explaining the motivation. The statement implied that the person’s emails and calls to the diocese to complain about the sculpture had been ignored.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shasta@lemm.ee 38 points 4 months ago

Hold up. The artist thinks the Virgin Mary is a good example of women having a right to their own bodies? This is a woman who was supposedly forcibly impregnated by a god. What bodily autonomy does her story exhibit?

[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

The Christian kind, I suppose

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's fine to be Christian. I just don't understand how the artist's quote is relevant in any way to this piece of work they made or the defacement of it. The closest I can fathom is that it's a woman. The logic ends there.

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm not sure if it's the artists intention or not, but it gets at the heart of a lot of misogyny. What could possibly be controversial about Mary giving birth? It's an interesting question to put to the (mostly) men who decry the installation.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

I think they resent the reminder that a woman gave birth to their god. A woman having that kind of power and authority is abhorrent in their minds.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law,

Galatians 4:4

They should read their own book in that case.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

To clarify: They know it. They just don't like being reminded. In their minds, any suggestion that women should have a more active role in the church hierarchy is borderline heresy.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

No heresy about it. First Timothy. Are you a women who identifies as a Christian? If so you are too keep silent because the people with cocks are talking. Don't like? Stop worshipping a lie.

Never ever will get why women put up with the Abrahamic faiths. Be better to just stick a knife in the throat of their local shaman and get executed vs living a life as a sex doll.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Oh it's a great story about the lack of autonomy.

Warn your kids against Christianity, the entire religion is predicated on rape. Jesus is a rape baby. Full stop.

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 25 points 4 months ago

You mean to tell me someone did something as punk as beheading the virgin Mary and I can't even celebrate it because it was some traditionalist asshole trying to prove a dumb point?

Fuckin' LAAAAAME!

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The person who did this is a Christian fundy. The opposite of punk.

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah that's what's so disappointing lol.

[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago

The work had drawn criticism from some Catholics, who said it was blasphemous.

I won't deny it's kind of an odd idea for a sculpture and clearly designed to create controversy, but claiming that it's blasphemous just confirms the fact that they don't know the definition of the word. It just depicts a defining moment in Christian history, whether you like the aesthetics or not... The Catholic church has definitely celebrated weirder things.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'm convinced all of these issues are just about power. The men on charge just can't let women decide instead of men...even when it comes to what's in women's bodies ... BY destroying the art they're attempting to take the power,but in reality it just makes the piece stronger.

It is new art, the message has changed and it's even more powerful.

[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

The interesting thing to me regarding both power and blasphemy is that by the fact that it was on display in a major cathedral, those in charge have already given it their blessing. Anyone calling "blasphemy" only looks like a fool.

So you have these "traditionalists" wanting to drag the Church backwards. But due to the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church that's just not how it works. Church leadership has made significant progressive strides over the last decade, leaving people like this Tschugguel with only impotent rage and vandalism as their options. And as you state this only adds new context to the art, giving it more power and ensuring that their regressive goals are not taken seriously.

Meanwhile the Evangelicals have gone absolute nutters, I never thought I would see the day where the Catholics were the "progressive" church. But they play the long game, and have always changed along with society over the millenia.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

That Mary is awfully pale for someone who trekked across the Middle East to give birth.

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Tschugguel became a hero to traditionalists in 2019 when he snuck into a Vatican-area church, stole Amazonian Indigenous statues of pregnant women, and threw them into the Tiber River in a videotaped act that was quickly shared online.

Holy shit, what an asshole. Why is this guy so grossed out by pregnant women?

[-] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Why is this guy so grossed out by pregnant women?

Fucked around and found out which consequences it may have?

[-] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Wtf did I just read.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

The artist who created the “crowning” sculpture, Esther Strauss, also condemned the destruction, according to the Linz diocese statement. “Most portraits of the Virgin Mary were made by men and have therefore often served patriarchal interests,” she said, adding that in her sculpture, “Mary gets her body back”.

"Crowning"... I think I might love this artist.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

The face looks rather... Hapsburg.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I refuse to believe it wasn't a spiky haired 12 year old boy trying to impress some local toughs

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
70 points (88.9% liked)

News

23296 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS