546
Or...
The president can just order the DOJ to imprison him for actions against the US government and outright treason.
And it would be totally legal
But he won't, because he doesn't take the threat of fascism serious.
Joe Biden is acting like a complete pussy following milquetoast Merrick’s lead
"Nothing will fundamentally change."
Toss him in jail for one day and you'd see all this shit stop.
Add the owner of fox in the same cell. You'd be amazed how quickly things would clean themselves up.
Took one bullet to stop 1/6.
Fascists are usually cowards, but they'll always keep pushing till there's consequences.
Biden will not fucking give them consequences. They gave him the power to, and dude immediately announced publicly that he'd never do it.
Like, that alone should be disqualifying.
Biden treats this personal, it's him vs trump. But this is so much bigger and so much more important than either of those old rich men.
Yup. I keep drifting back to RGB and how much she screwed us. (obv it's Republicans fault in the end, but she could have played that a bit different)
Bullies on a bigger scale
You'll have to extract Rupert Murdoch from Australia.
I'm pretty sure we could find some Australians willing to hand him over
Any not in his pay
Tbh I expect they’d thank us if we set ST6 on him like bin Laden. Genuinely, Murdoch has had just as profound and negative of an effect on society, but also enriched himself enormously in the process. Dude is one evil motherfucker.
I don't believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn't a regular part of the president's duty.
The best king example I've seen is that the president would be within the law if they shot the director of homeland security - the president is allowed to control who is in that position, they can remove them at will - the SC ruling means that the method they chose to remove that person is now unimpeachable... if they chose to suspend them by freeing them of their mortal coil they're "acting within official duties".
I don’t believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn’t a regular part of the president’s duty.
Directing the DOJ is
So Biden can direct them to arrest someone, and throw them in gitmo.
His motivations can't be investigated. And directing the DOJ is within a presidents power
It might be illegal for the DOJ personnel to follow that order, but he can just tell them he'll pardon them for any crimes they're charged with for following his order and that he'll murder them if they don't follow his order, and all of that is totally legal
It might be illegal
But we'll never know, because looking into his motivations is literally forbidden.
All he can be tried for is the action in a vacuum. And if it was explicitly within his powers. He's good
Literally anything that goes thru an agency is automatically cool.
That's why it's so dangerous to half ass this election and for Biden to just ignore all the power he has.
The president can pardon people for unspecified things (proven by Trump). He can pardon anyone for "following orders"
If he cared about protecting the country from fascism, he wouldn’t be running.
Impeach Clarence thomas
Fucking shoot Clarence Thomas into the sun.
Shooting him into the sun would be a waste of delta-v. Shoot him out of the solar system.
It might take more delta v but it would be worth it
Been a while since my Kerbal days when I read a bit about all this orbital mechanics crap and I remember that there was something counterintuitive about the delta-v required to hit the sun vs escape the solar system; I think compared to escaping, if you start from Earth you need almost 3x the delta-v to hit the sun, but I can't remember why. Something to do with the huge gravity well, because it got worse the closer you are to the sun
edit: lol I totally misread you, but also I found a video and duh yeah the reason was obvious: it's because we're moving around the sun at ~30km/s and to hit the sun you need to use that much delta-v to slow down to make your orbit tight enough to actually hit the sun instead of getting slingshotted / staying in orbit: https://youtu.be/LHvR1fRTW8g?si=1eIyeeqWR61wRu08. Escape velocity for the solar system is ~10km/s
The regular kind will suffice.
We knew he was a garbage human being during the Anita Hill hearings.
That he's still a garbage human being now that he had even more power shouldn't be a surprise to anyone with any understanding of how people work.
We knew he was a garbage human being during the Anita Hill hearings
Man, if only the head of that committee was a real leader. One willing to stand up for what is right, defend the victim, keep decorum, and allow the multiple other woman with similar complaints to testify...
Imagine if Clarance could have been kept off the court
I guess it would be pointless to look up who that was, it was 30 years ago and the Senator would have already been pretty senior to head that committee...
I'm sure he's far a way from modern politics by now, hell, he'd have to be like 81 years old now!
No reason to disturb his likely retirement enjoying his time with his family.
Thank god we learned from that and haven't confirmed any other justices with credible allegations of sexual assault against them. Imagine where we'd be if we confirmed that clown who regularly boofed beer.
Yeah, not like he's POTUS or anything...
Four hours without someone feeling the need to explain the joke...
I vividly remember a newspaper clipping about the Anita Hill hearings being displayed at my school in 10th grade. If only I knew that POS would not only still be there 33 years later, but would be actively trying to destroy democracy.
This dude needs to have been kicked out decades ago
He shouldn't have made it to the bench with the nomination hearings exposing his sexual harassement. Same with Kavanaugh.
Turns out, he was ahead of his time.
Predictor, or precedent?
Predator.
Probably both.
Get that professional sugarbaby off the court.
How has nobody offered him a yacht holiday and then extracted the ship's crew in the middle of nowhere in Pacific.
That would be pretty hilarious
John Oliver offered him $1mil a year to retire and a brand new Winnebago yet upon the highest court he still reigns with that shifty ass smirk across his face
Which is proof he already gets more
Which will go nowhere.
Stil worth doing even if it is just used as a way to support future efforts to reform SCOTUS.
Nah, he's immune. He's part of the supremes.
Now that there isn't any time left to do anything...
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
546 points (98.9% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4221 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS