this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
105 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

3446 readers
282 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Congress accused advertisers group of colluding to tank X's revenue.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened "free speech" and "the invisible hand of the free market", Apartheid Lonny?

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Same thing that prevented the free market from tanking the auto industry in 08. Government saves it's favorite toys

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looked at from another angle, Musk wants courts/government telling businesses that they’re required to spend their money to support other businesses - regardless of how those businesses are run, or the beliefs touted by their outspoken executives.

This sounds like an absolute nightmare for republicans and libertarians. I almost hope it succeeds. It’s not like I’ve got a horse in this race.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not like I’ve got a horse in this race.

Same, except there's that whole "forward the cost to the consumer" thing that business tends to do. Especially when such rules apply to everyone, so there's no competitive disadvantage in doing so.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

Businesses will just redirect some of their existing advertising budget, which we’re already paying for anyway. The net cost to the consumer will remain the same.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 46 points 1 year ago

BREAKING NEWS: Man who destroys own company suing everyone else to blame them for his own incompetence!

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the argument is that by encouraging its members to stop advertising on Twitter this organization has deprived the market of conservative content and viewpoints which violates both antitrust and first amendment protections. I feel like that's going to be a tough sell considering Elon told advertisers concerned about his takeover of Twitter to go fuck themselves and he didn't need their money.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Actions having consequences??? I'm not sure Elon knows of such a concept!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 year ago

Whatsa matter emerald boy, is your nazi platform failing under your "leadership"? Go cry about it to the people you pay to tolerate your presence.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

Isnt this just the free market doing what it wants? Capitalism working as intended.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They should just play that clip where he said go fuck yourself over and over

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The big kids don't want to play with me Mommy"

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Thats not true. I love taking a baseball bat and smashing a baseball. Has Elon considered dressing up as the Cincinnati Reds mascot?

[–] MechKit@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

So that's how the free market works, anyone that doesn't buy your product is a criminal?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

what a little bitch boy

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The "free speech absolutist" at it again!

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And I call for a second moon!

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Elon. Take your drugs and sit down.

Or better: Step back and STFU!1!!

If Elonald wants advertisers to come back, perhaps he should apologize for being such an insufferable twat first.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They can always push trump bibles and anti-gay-frog pills. Or something. Whatever.

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got a video of this? Of him making that statement, directly from his mouth?

[–] yuri@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally the second sentence of the article contains a link to the post he made where the quite is sourced.

Literally the second sentence.

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh derp.. I didn't even see the link at the top of the page.