50

cross-posted from: https://linux.community/post/1144192

you might be an introvert, passionate about your job, or simply old enough to disregard friendships at work because you already have enough friends and a family.

The coworkers I like the most are the ones that come to work, don't like drama, do their job and go home. That's what I try to do.

However, there are always some established cliques who know how to play the unit / supervisor and get away doing much less, even feeling entitled to order you around, even though they are not your supervisor.

To people who experience this. How do you tolerate it? Even after changing jobs, this can happen at your new workplace, maybe it happens in every workplace?

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] faltryka@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

I used to be more sensitive to feeling like other people were getting more recognition for less work.

Over time though I’ve grown to realize that usually they are just doing something that I don’t fully understand yet, and I’ve gotten far greater rewards from trying to learn from them.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago

That's a very well adjusted point of view.

Don't be like me, that bottles up resentment that comes out in unexpected ways, which then leads to you being the first one laid off because you're the least enjoyable to work with.

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

In as much as it pertains to me, I don't tolerate it. Otherwise, if people want to bullshit their way through their career, I don't really care. This happens in every company that has more than one employee (almost).

If someone else starts ordering me around when they don't have the authority to do so, assuming it would change my course of action, I'll tell them politely that I might be able to get to that when I have time. If they escalate it, I tell them to talk to my boss about rearranging my priorities. And if they do that and succeed, that's fine. Once you establish that you don't report to them, I've found they typically leave me alone. If not, I talk to my boss about it in private.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 months ago

I like to encourage a culture of laziness at my work.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

If the whole world agreed to do 20% less work I think we’d all be fine and slightly more relaxed. Progress is overrated.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

Especially in business, it's like, who are we competing against - hostile aliens?? Nah, it's just us humans, trying to get by. We could be tossing eachother softballs, everyone winning, but instead there's this self-fulfilling fear of an existential threat from "rivals."

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

Omg you knocked it out of the park with this one. Everything is such a race to the bottom in this system.

It's always about competitive undercutting, and what's the most ruthless cold-blooded calculations one can get away with, and this Type A disease of being obsessed with zero-sum conflict to reveal who's the absolute best of everything.


"Why can't we just chill and it'll get there when it gets there?"

"What?! Look at (for example) China! Do you see them chilling? No! They normalized 12 hour shift burnout before us, this will increase their production 3%, and then undercut us by 12% and steal all our business and we're screwed! So we need to squeeze our people harder to beat them!"

"...And then they'll squeeze their people harder...so...?"

"..."

"..."

"This might be a good time to inform you we expect you to train the new overseas team before we'll surprise ambush-fire your entire department."


...Repeat the above but for undocumented immigrant labor...then maybe child labor...then probably right back around to slavery again...

"Oh no we all agreed this would be so bad for humanity, but gee, the competition did it and we wanna stay competitive so..."

Man seriously why can't we all just be doing our own thing lol...

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

God yeah, a hundred percent, great illustration of exactly what I was alluding to. It's so short sighted. Even the benefits are nothing compared to the heights we could reach if we oriented our economics around coopération.

Cruelly, this system "works" (or at least is successful in perpetuating its existence) right up until the point of resource collapse (or revolution, if we're looking at the good ending).

Thanks for your reply. I was pretty happy with this comment, so am chuffed to hear you appreciated it.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

So true. "Progress" seems to be defined as an arbitrary jagged line that can never ever seem to be high enough. What's the point then? 🤔

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Yes. "numbers go up" is a sickness.

[-] halykthered@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 months ago

My work stands on it's own two legs. Their work doesn't affect my paycheck. If their laziness impacts me, I will not stay silent about it at all. Other than that, I'm punching my clock and focusing on what I need to.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

However, there are always some established cliques who know how to play the unit / supervisor and get away doing much less, even feeling entitled to order you around, even though they are not your supervisor.

This frustrated me, until I discovered that many of those folks, who looked lazy to me, understood our business better than I did, and were focusing their efforts on what really mattered.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 23 points 4 months ago

It depends on what you define as lazy and popular.

I've had staff that were visibly not working harder than other staff, but their work was of significantly higher quality than others. Since the "lazy" worker produced more and could be counted on to do the work with less supervision, I gave them more flexibility in the office. I was playing favorites, but the favorite was more valuable as an employee.

And I've had other staff that would be considered more popular, but that was in part because they would help others at work doing coordination and mentoring tasks. I would also offload some of my managerial tasks to them if I was overwhelmed even though they didn't have the title. If I offload the management of a task to someone else, I expect people to treat them with the same respect they treat me. I've seen that expectation not get followed and I've had to step in to remind staff that they need to coordinate with others, not just me.

I find that a lot of people who "do their job and go home" don't end up doing any of the coordination or communication required for their job, even though their job is technical design. They end up being worse than they think at their job because it is so hard to work with them and won't chime in on cases where there is shared responsibility.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 12 points 4 months ago

The title sounds like this person is jealous that someone else found out they could do less work for the same money.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Seriously this

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

Suffer it.

Ideally, get to where you accept it.

Sorry to shortcut the process, but if you can't fix it and especially if you'd risk your own employment trying, it's better to keep your own job and the reduce the amount that this person lives rent-free in your feelings.

[-] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Moreover, if you see other people around you doing less, then you're under no obligation to do more than they do. Even if you prefer doing your job well, on those days where you're not up for it, don't feel bad about doing less. As long as that doesn't affect how your immediate manager/supervisor/boss evaluates you, do what you need to.

And let them do what they do. And if they get away with it, that's not up to you to remedy. Employment can be as simple as an agreement to do the minimun needed for them to keep paying you as little as they can get away with. And we're not likely to fix that problem today. 😉

Best wishes and peace.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

Just play the long game, which is focusing on getting good at your job to develop your own competency. In the long term, competency will help you get ahead.

Being popular at work is one of the competencies though, so you need to figure that one out too. Branch out and improve your social skills.

People are capable of rallying around someone who's reliable. Reliability in work becomes a big part of likability, actually. And if that's not the case, you can nudge the culture it in that direction by thanking people for delivering what they promised to you when they promised to do it.

Basically, when personal status and competency at the job are out of sync, that's an unhealthy state for the workplace. You can (to a degree) fix your own problem and the workplace's problem at the same time, by just using your own voice to acknowledge and appreciate when people do their jobs well.

It's a good feeling to go after a team as a goal, and doing the job well is a co-op aspect of the workplace. It's like bros at the gym: each person might be working on their own thing, but they share an interest in getting better. Even if the company doesn't have any other inspiring direction, the direction you can share with your coworkers can be "doing this in an excellent way".

So all of this boils down to a couple simple things, and the game works at many levels. It works immediately and long term, and for yourself and everyone else:

  1. Decide that your reason for doing the job well is primarily that it feels better than doing it poorly. Train yourself to do the job well for the pleasure of a job well done.

  2. Speak up and recognize others when they do their jobs well.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Do less too, if anyone dares to complain, document and point out the double standard then remind your employer that discrimination is illegal. If they punish you, sue and get rich I guess.

Or

Find a new job

Or

Just ignore it if you aren't stressed out with the amount of work you have

Or

Play the game too, humans are social creatures at the end of the day

We don't really know your life or situation so at best, all the advice here is educated guessing or worse.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

As a fellow introvert I had to learn the skill of drawing my boss' attention to my work without feeling like I was being arrogant or begging for attention.

I kept a list of things I thought I had done well or were above and beyond, and discussed it with them in performance reviews.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 4 months ago

I have a base load where I simply couldn't do less if I tried or I'd die of boredom and simply envy anyone who can.

also any shitkicker who fancys themselves in charge will quickly get told to act their fucking wage.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I don't begrudge a coworker befriending a supervisor. Maybe they are genuinely friends.

As much as you like people who come in a do their job and go home. Many others like it when they come in and a friend is there and they can chat, have a good time, and still get their responsibilities done.

If they can't get their work done, then it's a supervisors issue. You don't have to do their workload.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

If someone tells you to do their job, tell them 'no.'

If the supervisor tells you to do it, tell the supervisor that you can't handle more responsibilities because you're at your limit.

You have to stand up for yourself.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 4 points 4 months ago

I'm perfectly happy to make your life easier but not at the expense of making mine more difficult

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Do you want to focus on your job or a social club ?

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

Dude. There is workplace politics.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago

If that matters, then it's part of the job, not a social club

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

No its not. Its what happens when you get a bunch of people in the room. The job description does not mention socializing with people.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Pick your lane dude. I'm saying the post as described focuses on the job description.

So, should you care about the job, or the chit chat?

If politics are required for the job, but not listed in the job description (real world) then that must be discussed. If not, focus on your work.

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

what lane dude?

So, should you care about the job, or the chit chat?

the job, duh, but you also get skipped on promotions and other shit cause youre not involved in the chitchat. its how the politics affect your career. have you had a job before?

If politics are required for the job, but not listed in the job description (real world) then that must be discussed. If not, focus on your work.

which job actually lists “take part in office politics” in the job description?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Obviously. Are you trying to obscure things?

I've clearly stated that if "you" feel you need to handle the office politics to succeed, then that's a conversation to have.

If your job allows you to focus on your task without political concerns (like specific contract work where promotion isn't a thing), then who cares about the social cliques?

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

cool bro, have a nice day

[-] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Sometimes it’s couched as “team player”. Some jobs I had it absolutely mattered who you were friends with.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

mattered

But briefly, am I right? That kind of problem is best solved by changing your work address.

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Not always, it's mostly office culture in many places. Finding one where that doesn't happen is hard. Usually depends on the discipline the manager or boss has to not accidentally pick favorites and catch that behavior. Which doesn't always happen. There are some people, but they are a rare breed. People always end up forming cliques, and whoever is in the clique with the boss had an advantage in the workplace.

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Well if there's a choice - social club. What's even the point of having a job if you work all day just to survive and then try to squeeze socializing in the little time that remains until you need to sleep

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Post said "if you like doing your job"

So discussion on changing work life balance isn't relevant.

[-] kubica@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago

I'm in a similar situation and I'm taking it poorly because I feel that it is affecting the possibilities of the company, and with that mines as well. So currently I'm in the process of searching for a place that can have more future. Which being also an introvert is being quite a hell.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm in the process of searching for a place that can have more future.

Take note folks, this how it is done!

They don't pay or treat u right, get u a new corpo komissar who will pretend to do it for a bit

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

It somewhat depends. Is it unionized work? Is it hourly or salary? What type of work, and what are the metrics for quality/quantity of output?

[-] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I don't let what other people do ruin my happiness. If I'm happy with the work I'm doing and the amount I'm getting paid then I really don't care what other people do.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 4 months ago

What the guy over there said.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
50 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43885 readers
855 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS