380
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

A federal judge in Florida on Friday permanently blocked a key part of Governor Ron DeSantis’s anti-woke legislation that would have banned diversity- and race-related training in private workplaces.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teft@lemmy.world 144 points 3 months ago
[-] 58008@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

It's amazing to me that someone who has the wherewithal to rise to the highest offices in the land, can also be such a blubbering insecure weak little bitch that they need to legislate against having to hear about reality. But then again, Donald fucking Trump became president and might do so again. I guess the highest offices in the land are actually pretty easy to get to after all 🤷‍

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Easy if you have rich donors

[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 3 months ago

And no personal ethics at all. I dont think they even know what ethics are to begin with.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Let's not place the blame only on DeSantis. There's a large portion of the US who would be fine with Jim Crow being a thing again. Florida voters elected him because they knew he'd do this shit

[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A federal Mandate should be put in place where questionable laws which possibly violate the Constitution are not enforced until they are found legitimate.

He’s like a monkey throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

This seems to be a national problem

[-] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

I like the intent behind that, but it would also be scary to give the courts even more power at this time in history.

[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The court decides regardless, this would prevent unconstitutional laws from going into effect

[-] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah but the dynamic would probably change quite a bit if they were gatekeepers up front and new laws had to avoid a presidential veto plus a court veto. And it would let the courts act on their own rather then simply deciding cases that end up on their docket.

Like I said, the idea sounds like a nice thing. In just think we’ve seen enough to know that the execution would be a nightmare.

[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It would probably take a constitutional amendment to make questionably unconstitutional law something to be reviewed before it being implemented. Also include a timeline which it must be complete.

I know none of this will happen but I can dream

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago

go back to sleep, sheep

  • every Republican politician
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

They did all this and still Meatball Ron and Abhorrent Abbott were ignored in favour of couchfucker as Trump's VP pick. Sad!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Good. Also, fuck the National Review.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

"permanent" here means it will hold until the inevitable appeal to scRotus

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Lets see what Biden's plan to deal with them is. He's promised to do some kind of SCOTUS reform act before the end of his term.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

the current composition of congress makes any significant changes impossible to achieve.

best that can happen is introduction of such legislation, and their subsequent defeat or burial, this session will call-out republicans who block it--and then they get booted by voters in november in favor of those who will seek meaningful changes next year.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Awesome move from the judge.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
380 points (97.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS