235
submitted 3 months ago by MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world

North Dakota voters will decide this fall whether to eliminate property taxes in what would be a first for a state and a major change that officials initially estimate would require more than $1 billion every year in replacement revenue.

Secretary of State Michael Howe’s office said Friday that backers submitted more than enough signatures to qualify the constitutional initiative for the November general election. Voters rejected a similar measure in 2012.

Property taxes are the base funding for numerous local government services, including sewers, water, roads, jails, deputies, school building construction and teacher salaries — “pretty much the most basic of government,” said North Dakota Association of Counties Executive Director Aaron Birst.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 122 points 3 months ago
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

That'll show them socialist fascist commie lefty groomers.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 67 points 3 months ago

"What do you mean we have no police,fire,schools,water,roads? What happened?"-- dumbasses who ended property tax at the urging of the wealthy

[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Oh this is curious! Cause the solution would be for those services to be privatized. I wonder how many would pay for those services.

“No, Jimmy. You don’t need to go to skool. Now go change bale the hay.”

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

Sure thing daddy-brother!!

gets mangled in the baler because he's an idiot then dies because they closed down the firestation and first responders

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

What do you mean putting out the fire in my house costs me $25k?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

Traditionally, privatized services like that just took the house.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

State created a sales tax to replace it.

"Why are my groceries so expensive!!!"

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

What do you mean we have no police,fire,schools,water,roads?

Somehow there's always money in the banana stand for more cops.

[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Look what happend to kansas after they cut taxes like that. Libertarianism fails faster than communist countries every time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 months ago

There definitely are better taxes than property taxes. But, since it's a red state, they would probably replace it with a worse one. Or just debt.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago

It'll probably be replaced with sales tax increases. Sales taxes are very well-known to be regressive.

Or think of "low-tax" Texas, where every other road is privately operated and charges tolls out the ass.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 48 points 3 months ago

Even ignoring privatized services, taxes in Texas are higher than California for the average person. It’s a total myth unless you belong to the upper class.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Hence why "low tax" is between quotation marks

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“Every other road…” serious [citation needed] there. I live in San Antonio (you know 6th, largest city, metro of 2.2m people) and there’s not a single toll road. Austin, Dallas and Houston have a few but it’s by far not every other road. You can get around on 10, 35, 45 and the corresponding ring roads just fine.

Also the property taxes here are quite high compared to a lot of other states, but as such there’s no state income tax.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I live in Austin and they’ve built a toll road bypass to the interstate, added toll lanes to loop 1, and now they’re adding them to 183.

[-] Countess425@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Lt. Gov Dan Patrick is on a crusade to end property taxes and replace them with...🤷‍♀️

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

This would be great if it eliminated property tax for primary residences or something like that. Everything else is a handout to the wealthy.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Big A Libertarian Walks into a Bear energy.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Fun fact. That was in Grafton, NH. NH doesn't have sales tax. Instead, there's a correspondingly high property tax.

At least they get good value for it. The schools aren't terrible, and the roads are better than the much wealthier state of MA right nearby.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Does North Dakota have the same tourism industry that New Hampshire has?

[-] loie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Definitely not. There's Teddy Roosevelt National Park, which is gorgeous, but it doesn't attract nearly as much tourism of all the stuff that's four hours south...

South Dakota has Badlands National Park, Mount Rushmore, Crazy Horse, Wind Cave National Park, Jewel Cave National Monument, Minuteman Missile National Historic Site, Mammoth Site, Black Hills National Forest, Deadwood and Sturgis, a couple good private zoos in Reptile Gardens and Bear Country. All of that stuff is within a 1 hour drive of Rapid City, which has plenty of good hotels and restaurants and just generally what you'd expect from a modern midsize city. Rapid City is honestly worth the trip for anyone, but If you're a real outdoorsy person then you could easily enjoy a month out there. Oh and then not that far away (relatively speaking - 2 hours drive) is Devil's Tower in Wyoming.

So no... NoDak is comparatively sparse. And they probably like it that way.

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

Gonna get even more sparse when they eliminate running water and sewage service.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

NoDak is comparatively sparse. And they probably like it that way.

And therein lies the problem. New Hampshire gets away with it because they have money coming in from people visiting the state (and the state owning the liquor stores).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Lol. One of the "must see places" was the state capital. Which is a 21-floor art deco style sky-scraper.

Woop-dee doo.

What a weird-ass state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Another red welfare state making it worse

[-] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm pretty sure that this isn't a Democrat-Republican issue.

goes looking

Yeah.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/102015/7-best-states-property-taxes-and-why.asp

Nebraska and Texas have some of the highest effective property tax rates in the country.

Hawaii has one of the lowest, and California's pretty low too.

There's definitely regionality -- the Midwest has (mostly) high, and the western Great Plains states low -- but it doesn't really map to Democrat-Republican status.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

north dakota's tax burden overall is pretty low, though: 7th lowest among the states.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But you have to compare it in context.

In Canada, Alberta has no sales tax because they make so much money from oil. In normal conditions and with a working government that is not idiotic, such a system could work. However they have a stupid government that only does this to buy votes so when oil drops they drown

So, in this context, does North Dakota have an alternative revenue stream to compensate?

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

they have a stupid government that only does this to buy votes so when oil drops they drown

Remember, Peter Lougheed first won the region for the conservatives on a platform of fiscal resilience through diversification and using oil money specifically to fund the development and growth of people and sectors currently ignored. The ignored people liked this.

Then the party, after winning, gutted the plans.

So, it's not like this is their plan. It's their plan, despite alternative plans winning in the polls to get them the region, which were then gutted in favour of their plan. Said another way, they could have been better, the voters wanted better, they didn't get better, the voters didn't bury them for it. They're the "stop hitting yourself" of voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 months ago

This is a terrible idea, property taxes are better than pretty much all of the alternatives

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 months ago

They're replacing it with Land Value Tax, right? Right?..

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago

Or sales tax, or something else. High taxation and misuse of taxes is bad, but taxes themselves support the infrastructure everyone uses. So if they get rid of this, something else is going to have to take its place unless the property tax was way too high.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I thought we’ve seen what happens when you don’t have blended tax sources.

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

But surely, this time, it will work?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

That is a terrible idea if you want a functioning government.

That is a great idea if you want government to fail.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 25 points 3 months ago

The roads will take 10 years to turn into alabama, but they will.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Nope, North Dakota has snow and ice, so it won't even take 5.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Whatever they will come up with will be regressive and mostly affect poor people.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 19 points 3 months ago

Property taxes are the base funding for numerous local government services, including sewers, water, roads, jails, deputies, school building construction and teacher salaries — “pretty much the most basic of government,” said North Dakota Association of Counties Executive Director Aaron Birst.

I guess if that's really what they want to defund, then go for it, but don't expect any federal dollars.

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Once the most socialist states in the country...how far we have fallen. It is a politically sad place now.

[-] loie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
235 points (99.6% liked)

News

23284 readers
3595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS