No_Eponym

joined 2 years ago
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Linux phone, when? Please...

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I saw Tiffany playing in the sandbox. I hate sand...

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Got your PAL and/or other licences depending on your province? Can't just legally own body armour in Canada. It's controlled, like weapons.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

executed

Geez, recent updates to the tax code seem pretty harsh.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Same with the art and music from keygens from the 2000s

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In this instance, what is "authentication data" and what could someone do with it?

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago

Missed opportunity with an At-lass pun

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Certainly he will be the matter they use to unify the Republicans and move on from the Epstein Files

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This has been a great, unifying distraction from the Epstein files

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

About as much as I'd trust Rudy Giuliani

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I'm a sinner, I'm a saint,

I like to lick my taint

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

More encryption panic, better get everyone's ID if they are online or have a phone. Because of course criminals won't use stolen IDs or phones, just like they always use IDs and register their guns.

Also note, dispute the chats and sites being encrypted the cops have managed to review enough of them to supposedly establish a trend RE women's behaviour asking to participate in violence. So clearly encryption isn't a real barrier to law enforcement. But better ban it anyway!

 

Pull on the new flesh like borrowed gloves and burn your fingers once again.

 

It's almost like raising prices without improving the service causes people to cancel 🤔

 

Is the image proxy broken?

Posted this image: https://media3.giphy.com/media/IALvmllYJJD1AhPFrs/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952jiyrc08mier5pma36v56jao6q185y18tlb6qzv4y&ep=v1_internal_gif_by_id&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

In this post: https://lemmy.ca/post/25242756/10442736

I get a small box saying "Print pretty" from the comment link in Connect, gif wont load in the comment itself.

When I open the link externally in Firefox I get:

Is anyone else experiencing this? Or am I doing something wrong? Thank you!

 

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19487003

Lots of reasons to be looking at the framework Canada just published for consumer-driven (open) banking, but I thought this was a gem:

from "2.10 A Single Technical Standard"

...The Framework will significantly decrease the risks of personal data being compromised by bad actors and mitigate security, privacy, and liability risks for consumers and participants. This is achieved through the use of APIs, a type of software that acts as secure data “pipes” to enable different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.

If an API is a pipe, is the Internet a series of tubes?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19487003

Lots of reasons to be looking at the framework Canada just published for consumer-driven (open) banking, but I thought this was a gem:

from "2.10 A Single Technical Standard"

...The Framework will significantly decrease the risks of personal data being compromised by bad actors and mitigate security, privacy, and liability risks for consumers and participants. This is achieved through the use of APIs, a type of software that acts as secure data “pipes” to enable different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.

If an API is a pipe, is the Internet a series of tubes?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19487003

Lots of reasons to be looking at the framework Canada just published for consumer-driven (open) banking, but I thought this was a gem:

from "2.10 A Single Technical Standard"

...The Framework will significantly decrease the risks of personal data being compromised by bad actors and mitigate security, privacy, and liability risks for consumers and participants. This is achieved through the use of APIs, a type of software that acts as secure data “pipes” to enable different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.

If an API is a pipe, is the Internet a series of tubes?

 

Lots of reasons to be looking at the framework Canada just published for consumer-driven (open) banking, but I thought this was a gem:

from "2.10 A Single Technical Standard"

...The Framework will significantly decrease the risks of personal data being compromised by bad actors and mitigate security, privacy, and liability risks for consumers and participants. This is achieved through the use of APIs, a type of software that acts as secure data “pipes” to enable different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.

If an API is a pipe, is the Internet a series of tubes?

 

Technological development can destroy our sense of ourselves as rational, coherent subjects, leading to widespread suffering and destruction. But tools can also provide us with a new sense of what it means to be human, leading to new modes of expression and cultural practices.

Technology, for better or worse, affects every aspect of our lives. Our very sense of who we are is shaped and reshaped by the tools we have at our disposal.

The problem, for Stiegler, is that when we pay too much attention to our tools, rather than how they are developed and deployed, we fail to understand our reality. We become trapped, merely describing the technological world on its own terms and making it even harder to untangle the effects of digital technologies and our everyday experiences.

By encouraging us to pay closer attention to this world-making capacity, with its potential to harm and heal, Stiegler is showing us what else is possible.

archive.org

ghostarchive.org

archive.today

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/18659491

Technology, for better or worse, affects every aspect of our lives. Our very sense of who we are is shaped and reshaped by the tools we have at our disposal.

The problem, for Stiegler, is that when we pay too much attention to our tools, rather than how they are developed and deployed, we fail to understand our reality. We become trapped, merely describing the technological world on its own terms and making it even harder to untangle the effects of digital technologies and our everyday experiences.

By encouraging us to pay closer attention to this world-making capacity, with its potential to harm and heal, Stiegler is showing us what else is possible.

archive.org

ghostarchive.org

archive.today

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/18659491

Technology, for better or worse, affects every aspect of our lives. Our very sense of who we are is shaped and reshaped by the tools we have at our disposal.

The problem, for Stiegler, is that when we pay too much attention to our tools, rather than how they are developed and deployed, we fail to understand our reality. We become trapped, merely describing the technological world on its own terms and making it even harder to untangle the effects of digital technologies and our everyday experiences.

By encouraging us to pay closer attention to this world-making capacity, with its potential to harm and heal, Stiegler is showing us what else is possible.

archive.org

ghostarchive.org

archive.today

 

Technology, for better or worse, affects every aspect of our lives. Our very sense of who we are is shaped and reshaped by the tools we have at our disposal.

The problem, for Stiegler, is that when we pay too much attention to our tools, rather than how they are developed and deployed, we fail to understand our reality. We become trapped, merely describing the technological world on its own terms and making it even harder to untangle the effects of digital technologies and our everyday experiences.

By encouraging us to pay closer attention to this world-making capacity, with its potential to harm and heal, Stiegler is showing us what else is possible.

archive.org

ghostarchive.org

archive.today

view more: next ›