Wow that’s impressive.
Is it because the first two were prototypes so they bolted on whatever they needed without care for it looking nice or did they just refine it so much that they were able to simplify the design significantly?
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
119 points (94.1% liked)
interestingasfuck
1984 readers
1 users here now
Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That and the march of progress, despite what some people believe we are still evolving at a rapid pace and engine outputs have significantly increased recently.
"Progress the like of which the world has never seen the like of which." (scnr)
The first two prototypes looked like what traditional rocket engine looks like.
For example:
The RS-25 engine that equipped the space shuttle and now the SLS launcher
The Vulcain 2.1 that is on the Ariane 6
SpaceX put a lot of work on refining the engine, they also already produced more than 600 engines ! It's a crazy amount !
It's more of a refinement thing, where anything not absolutely necessary is removed, or 3D printed straight into the structure of the thing instead of added to the side.
I’m sure there is also a lot of diagnostic equipment that became superfluous or redundant once they figured out how the engine ran.
I think this happened mostly between Raptor 1 and 2
At this rate the Raptor 13 will be a platonic cone, and the 300 will be singular point in manifold space
That is pretty impressive. Going from a clusterfuck of tubes and pipes to a very clean looking engine
FWIW the Raptor 3 here does not include the turbopump mechanism. It would look pretty much the same as the raptor 2 (which does have the pump attached).
No, that's wrong. This is, in fact, the entire engine. It's not missing anything. It was test fired in this configuration. It honestly looks surreal.
