367
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

An image of JD Vance allegedly dressed as a woman and wearing a blonde wig was posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, on Sunday. The unconfirmed image quickly picked up steam and began trending under the hashtag #SofaLoren, a reference to the iconic Italian actress Sophia Loren and false claims that the Republican senator had sex with a couch.

Many commenters online connected Vance’s alleged history of cross-dressing with his legislative history—which has long been a point of concern for LGBTQ+ advocacy groups. 

The Ohio senator introduced the “Protect Children’s Innocence Act,” which aims to criminalize medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care to minors.

The Republican vice presidential pick also supports measures to limit classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity, and labeled critics of so-called “don’t say gay” legislation “groomers.”

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 75 points 3 months ago

spokesperson for the Republican vice presidential pick did not deny

the only thing they can do is ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist. saying "no, that's not vance" will just fan the flames, and saying "yes, that's vance" leads to the inevitable "if a main portion of your platform is condemning drag queens, then why is a drag queen your pick for VP"

so they don't say anything, and hope it goes away on its own, which, if couchfucker memes are any indication, it fucking won't

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I'm just waiting for them to Voltron and we get a drag, couch fucking JD Vance.

[-] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

You mean drag, dolphin-couch-threeway enthusiast JD Vance

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago

They can safely ignore it because they know their base only consumes Republican Approved Messaging™ in the form of right wing media propaganda outlets like Fox and Newsmax. So if it isn't there it doesn't exist to them.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Donald would just deny it. I don't understand anything about dimwits voting for Donald tho. Is it only Donald because they joined a personality cult that enabled their racism? Or is it a cult of racism and they'll allow anyone to get away with the things Donald does as long as it assists their bigotry?

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

Hey I recognize her! That's Anita Cushion

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Better watch out, if his boss sees this he might get the sudden urge to motorboat him.

[-] Poot@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 3 months ago

It's a nice skirt. I love the colors. Perfect for fall. 🍁🍂

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

If he had shaved he'd look pretty good tbh.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago

Everyone talking about hypocrisy, etc.

To them, it’s not hypocrisy. He’s staying on brand bc he is making fun of people. He is using it as a costume/to mock people. He wears it and thinks the joke is that it would be stupid to actually feel/believe that it is okay.

The anti-"woke" crowd won’t be disillusioned from this. They read between the lines then they’ll gaslight people.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Probably yeah, but wouldn't it be hilarious if every drag performer, every cross dressing enthusiast, and every transgender internet personality would now come out in defence for JD like he's Britney Spears after the 2007 MTV Video Music Awards?

Leave JD alone!!!

[-] Taxxor@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

So was this before or after his relationship with the couch?

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

Turns out JD was the bottom though.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

Is he revealing his alter ego, Anita Cushion?

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Blonde is not his type, like really.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Eye makeup on point.

[-] rickdg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

JDrag just wants to be loved

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And unconfirmed claims.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
367 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS