328
submitted 1 month ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/politics@lemmy.world

During an appearance on MSNBC's "Way Too Early," the New York Times' Peter Baker suggested Donald Trump is still having a great deal of difficulty coming to terms with the notion that he could lose in November to Vice President Kamala Harris.Baker claims that the former president's recent actions de...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 111 points 1 month ago

I'm going to fill in that Harris/Walz bubble so hard he's going to feel it.

He's going to lose, and I'm going to enjoy being a part of making it happen.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago

Nothing is guaranteed before the election.

And since Jan6th is how Trump left the last election, nothing is guaranteed even if the election wins. But an election victory in massive numbers would be our best bet moving forward. It cannot be close, Trump must be soundly defeated for the country to move forward effectively.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While I agree, I think trump will whip his sycophants into a lather if he loses, regardless of how close, and more people will get hurt and killed. They need deprogramming, like a Nazi in 1946. Or if they choose to act on their fuhrers orders, hanged for treason. The time to be soft on this shit is over, leniency will bring more January 6th's

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nazis lived on until they died, believing that the Holocaust was a myth.

That's why we built the Holocaust museum and other WW2 museums. To make sure that as the Nazis died off decades or a century later, that our message would outlast them.

There's no "deprogramming" here. This is going to be a lifelong obligation for us to fight against bad ideas.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

Start hanging them. They'll run for the rocks they crawled out of.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Exactly. That video of the police officer being chased by a mob down hallways of one of our highest institutions makes me sick for what Trump is doing to our democracy.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The risk isn't another Jan-6. The risk is from his cronies positioned as election officials in the coming election.

Imagine a few counties in various states that refuse to certify the vote counts because of supposed irregularities. Imagine the miriad lawsuits that will be files by Trump's sycophants on Nov. 3rd. They will tie up the elections in as many states as they can with the goal of having SCOTUS step in and declare Trump the winner.

The chaos and violence this time will not be in DC. It'll be everywhere else.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The risk isn't another Jan-6. The risk is from his cronies positioned as election officials in the coming election.

This - well, it’s probably both, but the “legal vote stealers” will be gunning for anyone they can get away with steamrolling. Crooked judges or weak Democratic responses will mean we lose legitimate vote counts to theft.

That will be very bad, for all the reasons, and again - that is their plan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Once positive difference: The current president is Biden, not Trump. Assuming Harris wins, Biden will absolutely ensure that nothing even remotely like January 6th is allowed to happen again.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He’ll have to activate the army in red states because they've already passed their unconstitutional laws. And the MAGA white trash parade will be non-stop, armed, and stupid as fuck.

I mean - they’re completely believing a demented sociopath. And lots of gravy seals are ready to kill innocent people again. They really don’t understand how fucked up they’ve made things. Because of all the bigly winning.

I hope they’ve got the sense to prepare for batshit preppers gone wild.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah well he and his cronies were also in power during and before that time so I think we'd have a bit more backup this time

[-] Spitzspot 12 points 1 month ago

Jimmy Carter shall lead the way!

[-] Sumocat@lemmy.world 93 points 1 month ago

Again. He may lose again. He lost the popular vote twice. He will definitely lose it a third time, and he may lose the election again. “Again” needs to be emphasized because he’s going to keep trying and we must make sure he loses again.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

Trump said to be struggling to come to grips that he may lose again

FTFY

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 34 points 1 month ago

Remember that "The Democrats are the best at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory" is a thing and we've still got some time to go until November.

I'm not believing anything is over until February. I'll give January to all the lawsuits they'll file and whatever stolen election bullshit they're going to pull, but I'm not going to believe Trump will lose that easily even if the rally sizes are "looking good" for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 33 points 1 month ago

😂 It would make my day to see him lose to a woman. And the icing on the cake is she is a minority some even say black. I'm actually excited to vote now.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

That's a good point. Not only will we see democracy spared, we'll get to see low t humiliated by losing to a woman of color.

I cannot wait to vote.

[-] joekar1990@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

You can go back even to 2016 where he was laying the ground work to say he didn't lose to Hilary and then he won and I think it shocked him a bit. He's always been like this though across everything.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

It’d be terrible if all the stress gave him a massive heart attack.

[-] OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

It would be shame if the heart attack was caused by being torn apart by a pack of wild dogs. I hope he doesn't catch fire and there's nobody around with a full bladder to put out the flames.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago

I honestly wouldn't walk across a street to piss on him if he was on fire.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 1 month ago

this ancient orange piece of shit is overstressed and could just fucking die at any time. puts a smile on my face every time i think about it.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Hopefully on camera at one of his misinformation events.

[-] aniki 6 points 1 month ago

I am so excited to take a shit on his grave after his inevitable heart attack.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

I will also be there for the group poop

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

He didn't even come to grips losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.

[-] formergijoe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Or having less people at his inauguration than Obama.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Anyone here ever watched Downfall? I'll be honest, I kinda hate Trump=Hitler comparisons, but this article and Trump's past few weeks reminds me a lot of Hitler's final scenes in the film, just completely delusional about some long-since destroyed corps coming in to save Berlin from the overwhelming Reds. I can only hope that it turns out that way

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I would pay to watch Trump angrily and frustratingly banging on a table screaming " Nein Nein Nein", more so with tears in his eyes and his pack behind him knowing they can't interfere without taking the brunt of it, watching their world view just smolder to the ground.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

A trump in denial is a dangerous thing. Expect him to mobilize his band of slack-jawed troglodytes.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Nothing more dangerous than an orange imbecile out of options.

[-] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I see you have met my cat

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

He didn't come to grips with it last time around. Why would this be different?

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago

"Where's Joe???"

Its definitely Alzheimer's

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

It's tsundere

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Oh he is going to lose and he is going to lose badly.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

We said that A LOT in 2016.

A lot.

Because - I mean . . . right? What sane person would want this horrific bastard anywhere near government ever??

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Clent@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

The issue he's going to face is that he has no power this time.

Last time he was the president. He was able to set up the situation that lead to a crisis with no immediate response.

There is no way that happens. They will be ready regardless of how likely anything is going to develop.

I won't be surprised if there is a much larger body count this time around. I would be disappointed if the order to shoot on sight wasn't given for anyone that storms any federal building.

They need to be prepared for bombings like what happened in Oklahoma all those years ago.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure what's worse, the idea that he may recognize that he lost the election and tries to stage a coup to steal it, or the idea that he honestly and genuinely believes that he won and tries to stage a coup to enforce it.

[-] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Well make sure it's a reality, please remember to VOTE!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

He just thought he was going to waddle his way to an easy victory, didn't he? Especially after that Republican kid shot at him and before Biden stepped down...

[-] echo 11 points 1 month ago

He's always been separated from reality. If he's suffering, it may be that he's actually having to face reality.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Orange traitor bitch is going to die in prison. Holla!

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

I think he's going to fly out of a window first. He still owes that half a billion in loans to a guy that likes to have people tossed out windows. If he doesn't win, he can't sell secrets to pay for it, and we all know he's broke.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

He won't, but wouldn't it be great...

[-] ChrisG@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He’s motivated by Attention, Grifting and not going to jail.

He will throw GOP & the cult under the bus by dropping out after he’s finished strip mining them of every penny and seek a pardon in exchange for a promise to call off the cult.

Like Nixon he will do anything to avoid jail

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
328 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
5996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS